Formative Assessment Review Project
Cherie Collins

TL;DR
This paper outlines changes to formative assessment in psychiatric training to better track resident doctors' progress and skills.
Contribution
The paper introduces new assessment methods like entrustability scales and patient feedback to enhance training evaluation.
Findings
Entrustability scales will be adapted for workplace-based assessments and case presentations.
Resident doctors will collect multisource feedback during training and include it in ARCP reviews.
Guided supervision sessions will now include non-clinical skills observation in online portfolios.
Abstract
Aims: Following the approval of the Assessment Strategy Review (ASR) in February 2023, the Formative Assessment Working Group (FAWG) was created to discuss areas for consideration, in relation to formative assessment. The aim was to consider the broad range of the College’s assessments, including written examinations, the Clinical Assessment of Skills and Competencies (CASC) and formative assessments undertaken throughout psychiatric training in the workplace. Whilst the ASR had a broad scope, one of the recommendations was to review formative assessment in detail, due to the varied nature of specialty and sub-specialty specific assessments and the differing experiences of resident doctors in the workplace. Methods: The Formative Assessment Working Group (FAWG) met throughout 2023 and identified four specific areas for further consideration, development and implementation: The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Innovations in Medical Education
