Performance of the LIAISON PLEX yeast blood culture assay for identifying 16 invasive fungal pathogens in blood cultures
Christopher L. Emery, Neelam Dhiman, Siu-Kei Chow, Gwyn Peterson, Paul Granato, Brian Bernier, Janet Farhang

TL;DR
A new blood culture assay rapidly and accurately identifies 16 invasive fungal pathogens in bloodstream infections, improving treatment speed and accuracy.
Contribution
The LIAISON PLEX Yeast Blood Culture assay demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for detecting 16 fungal pathogens in blood cultures.
Findings
The assay achieved 100% detection of target fungal pathogens and 0% false positives in negative blood cultures.
It showed 100% reproducibility within and across sites, with high sensitivity and specificity in both clinical and contrived samples.
The assay detected low concentrations of fungi even in the presence of high concentrations of confounding organisms.
Abstract
Fungi frequently cause potentially life-threatening bloodstream infections, particularly in immunocompromised and hospitalized individuals. Molecular methods can allow earlier pathogen identification for faster optimization of appropriate therapy. This multisite study evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the automated multiplex LIAISON PLEX Yeast Blood Culture nucleic acid assay (Luminex Corporation, Northbrook, IL), which detects and identifies 14 Candida and 2 Cryptococcus pathogens from positive blood cultures. Samples included 69 prospectively collected specimens, 63 pre-selected samples, and 829 contrived specimens. The assay demonstrated 100% positivity in detecting target fungal pathogens and 0% positivity in negative blood cultures. All 13 tested bottle/matrix types gave 100% detection of six evaluated pathogens. Limits of detection ranged from 7.77 × 102 CFU/mL…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Parameter | Prospective ( | Pre-selected ( |
|---|---|---|
| Specimens, | Specimens, | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 36 (52.2) | 24 (38.1) |
| Female | 32 (46.4) | 25 (39.7) |
| Gender Unknown | 1 (1.4) | 14 (22.2) |
| Total | 69 (100.0) | 63 (100.0) |
| Age (years) | ||
| 0–1 | 3 (4.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| >1–5 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.6) |
| >5–21 | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| >21–65 | 41 (59.4) | 27 (42.9) |
| >65 | 23 (33.3) | 19 (30.2) |
| Age unknown | 1 (1.4) | 16 (25.4) |
| Total | 69 (100.0) | 63 (100.0) |
| Subject status | ||
| Emergency room | 5 (7.2) | 0 (0.0) |
| Hospitalized | 22 (31.9) | 2 (3.2) |
| Status unknown | 42 (60.9) | 61 (96.8) |
| Total | 69 (100.0) | 63 (100.0) |
| Blood culture bottle type | ||
| BD BACTEC lytic anaerobic | 3 (4.3) | 2 (3.2) |
| BD BACTEC Plus aerobic | 14 (20.3) | 17 (27.0) |
| BD BACTEC standard aerobic | 5 (7.2) | 29 (46.0) |
| BacT/ALERT FA Plus | 40 (58.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| BacT/ALERT FN Plus | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| BacT/ALERT PF Plus | 2 (2.9) | 0 (0.0) |
| BacT/ALERT SA standard aerobic | 3 (4.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| BacT/ALERT SN standard anaerobic | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Bottle type unknown | 0 (0.0) | 15 (23.8) |
| Total | 69 (100.0) | 63 (100.0) |
| Fungal pathogen | Sensitivity/PPA | Specificity/NPA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP/(TP + FN) | Sensitivity/PPA (%) | 95% CI (%) | TN/(TN + FP) | Specificity/NPA (%) | 95% CI (%) | |
|
| 34/34 | 100 | 89.8–100.0 | 97/98 | 99.0 | 94.4–99.8 |
|
| 4/4 | 100 | 51.0–100.0 | 128/128 | 100 | 97.1–100.0 |
|
| 0/0 | NA | NA | 132/132 | 100 | 97.2–100.0 |
|
| 0/0 | NA | NA | 132/132 | 100 | 97.2–100.0 |
|
| 46/46 | 100 | 92.3–100.0 | 86/86 | 100 | 95.7–100.0 |
|
| 0/0 | NA | NA | 132/132 | 100 | 97.2–100.0 |
| 0/0 | NA | NA | 132/132 | 100 | 97.2–100.0 | |
|
| 1/1 | 100 | 20.7–100.0 | 131/131 | 100 | 97.2–100.0 |
|
| 4/4 | 100 | 51.0–100.0 | 128/128 | 100 | 97.1–100.0 |
|
| 0/0 | NA | NA | 132/132 | 100 | 97.2–100.0 |
|
| 2/2 | 100 | 34.2–100.0 | 130/130 | 100 | 97.1–100.0 |
|
| 17/17 | 100 | 81.6–100.0 | 114/115 | 99.1 | 95.2–99.8 |
|
| 6/6 | 100 | 61.0–100.0 | 123/126 | 97.6 | 93.2–99.2 |
| 5/5 | 100 | 56.6–100.0 | 127/127 | 100 | 97.1–100.0 | |
| Pathogen target | Positive percent agreement | Negative percent agreement | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyte | TP/(TP + FN) | PPA (%) | 95% CI (%) | TN/(TN + FP) | NPA (%) | 95% CI (%) |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 776/777 | 99.9 | .099.3–100.0 |
|
| 49/49 | 100 | 92.7–100.0 | 778/778 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 | |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 777/777 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 |
|
| 50/50 | 100 | 92.9–100.0 | 776/777 | 99.9 | 99.3–99.9 |
|
| 49/49 | 100 | 92.7–100.0 | 775/778 | 99.6 | 98.9–99.9 |
| 100/100 | 100 | 96.3–100.0 | 727/727 | 100.0 | 99.5–100.0 | |
| Co-infection detected | False positive target |
|---|---|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| NA |
| On-panel high-concentration target | High-concentration target positivity (%) | On-panel low-concentration target | Low-concentration target positivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 (3 out of 3) | 100 (3 out of 3) | ||
| 100 (3 out of 3) | 100 (3 out of 3) | ||
| 100 (3 of 3) | 100 (3 out of 3) | ||
| 100 (3 of 3) | 100 (3 out of 3) | ||
| 100 (3 of 3) | 100 (3 out of 3) | ||
| 100 (3/3) | 100 (3 out of 3) |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntifungal resistance and susceptibility · Fungal Infections and Studies · Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
INTRODUCTION
Systemic fungal infections account for 3.8 million deaths per year worldwide, with approximately 68% of fatalities directly attributed to the infection (1). Many Candida spp. are normal residents of the human skin, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary microbiomes. Infection occurs when host defenses are suppressed (e.g., HIV infection, organ transplant patients, and chemotherapy for malignancy) or when resident microbiome populations become imbalanced and permit Candida overgrowth (e.g., from broad-spectrum antibiotic use). Invasive candidiasis is composed of bloodstream infections (candidemia) and hematogenous infection of deep tissues (e.g., heart, abdominal cavity, and central nervous system) that is often accompanied by candidemia (2). The annual global incidence of invasive candidiasis is 700,000 cases (3), with a fatality rate of approximately 40% (4). In the USA, hospitalization for fungal infections costs an estimated 1.4 billion (5).
Of the different Candida spp. known to cause infection in humans, the most common species responsible for more than 90% of invasive infections are Candida albicans, Candida glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabratus), Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, and Candida krusei (Pichia kudriavzevii) (6). While C. albicans remains the most common species causing infections, there has been an increase in candidemia due to non-albicans Candida spp. Notably, Candida auris (Candidozyma auris), only identified in 2009 by Japanese researchers, has emerged as a novel multidrug-resistant pathogen with high outbreak potential (7). The World Health Organization (WHO) recently compiled a fungal priority pathogen list (WHO FPPL) to rank 19 common and emerging fungal pathogens based on public health threat, antifungal resistance, global distribution, and epidemiological trends (8). Four of the 19 pathogens evaluated are categorized as of “critical priority” for healthcare and research and development efforts: C. albicans, C. auris, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus. Of the eight fungal pathogens deemed high priority, three are Candida spp.
Diagnosis of invasive fungal disease remains challenging because of the overlap of clinical features with bacterial infections, reliance on blood culture assays with limited sensitivity that can take several days to yield positive results, and the often invasive nature of sampling required for histopathological evaluation (9). Standard blood culture has a sensitivity of 21%‒71% in identifying candidemia in autopsy-proven samples, trending lower in early disease and in patients who have begun prophylactic antifungal therapy (10). Blood culturing for Candida spp. typically has 72‒96 h turnaround times (longer for some species), which delays treatment initiation and leads to increased mortality (6). Initially, positive blood culture results often require detailed follow-up testing to confirm pathogen identity and characterize its resistance to different antifungal drug classes in the current medical armament (11). Alternative diagnostic approaches such as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and non-culture techniques such as PCR analysis and beta-D-glucan testing may improve Candida detection (12–14).
The current study evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of a qualitative multiplexed molecular in vitro diagnostic test, the LIAISON PLEX Yeast Blood Culture (BCY) Assay (Luminex Corporation). Requiring only approximately 1 minute of hands-on time and 2 h from sample to result, this automated BCY Assay simultaneously evaluates positive blood culture samples for the presence of fungal nucleic acids to identify 14 pathogenic Candida spp. and 2 Cryptococcus spp. that cause most cases of systemic fungal infection (1).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LIAISON PLEX Yeast Blood Culture Assay
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay (FDA Clearance # K240627) is a qualitative multiplex nucleic acid-based diagnostic assay that detects 14 targets for the identification of 16 fungal pathogens commonly responsible for bloodstream infection (15). The targets included in the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay are Candida albicans, Candida auris (Candidozyma auris), Candida dubliniensis, Candida famata (Debaryomyces hansenii), Candida glabrata (Nakaseomyces glabratus), Candida guilliermondii (Meyerozyma guilliermondii), Candida kefyr (Kluyveromyces marxianus), Candida krusei (Pichia kudriavzevii), Candida lipolytica (Yarrowia lipolytica), Candida lusitaniae (Clavispora lusitaniae), Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Candida haemulonii/Candida duobushaemulonii (combined target), and Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii (combined target). The BCY Assay is intended to confirm and extend findings from blood cultures that Gram stain positive for yeast, reliably and more quickly than subsequent culture-based downstream approaches. The LIAISON PLEX System automates sample analysis in a fully integrated system that performs all of the assay steps in a single cartridge (16). Briefly, broth samples from blood culture with Gram stain indicating yeast are vortexed, and 300 µL volumes are pipetted into the assay cartridge; the Sample ID barcode and cartridge ID barcode are scanned using the system’s handheld scanner; the sample cartridge is loaded into the instrument, and run parameters are specified and initiated. Sample preparation and loading require approximately 1 minute of hands-on time, and results are available in about 2 h.
Automated LIAISON PLEX sample processing involves magnetic bead-based nucleic acid isolation and subsequent amplification by multiplex PCR to generate target-specific amplicons that are then hybridized to specific capture oligonucleotide probes microarrayed on a glass slide. The bound target DNA amplicons are subsequently decorated by hybridizing gold nanoparticle-conjugated target-specific oligonucleotide probes, followed by colloidal silver signal enhancement. The instrument then assesses light scatter by the silver-enhanced microarray spots to characterize the presence (detected) or absence (not detected) of each fungal analyte.
Clinical performance
Diagnostic accuracy of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was evaluated using 70 specimens prospectively collected between June 2023 and October 2023 from four geographically diverse clinical sites across the USA. Samples were remnant, de-identified, blood culture specimens from patients exhibiting clinical signs and symptoms of bloodstream infection, evidenced by positive identification with a continuous monitoring blood culture system. All prospectively collected specimen identities were determined by the standard of care culture and mass spectrometry (matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight [MALDI-TOF]) methods used at each clinical site. Continuous monitoring blood culture systems included the BacT/ALERT VIRTUO (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l'Étoile, France), BacT/ALERT 3D (bioMérieux SA), and BD BACTEC (Becton, Dickinson and Company; Franklin Lakes, NJ).
Clinical runs and reruns were performed on the LIAISON PLEX System by trained operators at four clinical sites. Because several fungal pathogen targets exhibited low prevalence rates in the prospective study, the prospective sample set was supplemented with 63 pre-selected de-identified blood culture specimens obtained from six vendors in the USA (University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX; NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Southwest Bio, Albuquerque, NM; Laboratory Alliance of Central New York, Liverpool, NY; Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY; and Discovery Life Sciences, Huntsville, AL). Pre-selected specimen collection dates spanned December 2019‒August 2023. Pre-selected specimens were identified by standard of care culture methods and confirmed by the BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel prior to study enrollment and were stored at −70°C before testing. Pre-selected specimens were tested in a randomized, blinded manner with negative specimens at one site in October 2023.
Contrived specimens were tested to supplement the positive clinical specimens in the prospective and pre-selected study cohorts for all targets. Contrived specimens were prepared from multiple strains of each organism obtained from commercial sources. Each strain was subcultured to Sabouraud dextrose agar and incubated 1-3 days until visible colony growth was achieved. Isolated colonies were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline to a concentration of approximately 3.0 × 10^8^ CFU/mL (1.0 McFarland standard). A 100 µL aliquot of the suspension was used to inoculate BACT/ALERT FA Plus blood culture bottles (bioMérieux) containing whole blood from individual healthy donors that were purchased from a commercial source. Each inoculated blood culture bottle was grown to positivity on a BACT/ALERT 3D continuous monitoring automated blood culture system (bioMérieux), and contents were collected within 8 h of bottle positivity. A minimum of 50 contrived specimens were prepared for each target that did not reach 30 positive specimens in the combined prospective and pre-selected arms of the study. A total of 829 specimens were contrived, blinded, randomized, and tested along with negative specimens at four testing sites during June 2023–August 2023.
Analytical performance overview
The LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was evaluated for limit of detection (LoD), compatibility with diverse commercial culture bottles/matrices, detectability of multiple target variants, potential interfering substances, impact of diverse fungal and bacterial co-infections as potential interferents, run-to-run carryover, and intralab/inter-operator repeatability and site-to-site reproducibility. Reference fungal cultures were from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA), Fungal Biodiversity Centre (CBS, Utrecht, Netherlands), and the US Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI Resources; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD).
Target detection
Fourteen organisms representing each of the 14 reportable targets included in the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay were grown in blood culture media bottles and evaluated by the assay at bottle positivity (average concentrations ranging from 4.37 × 10^5^ to 3.61 × 10^7^ CFU/mL) and after an additional 8 h incubation (average concentrations ranging from 4.10 × 10^6^ to 1.47 × 10^8^ CFU/mL). Three bottles at each incubation time were grown for each organism and tested in triplicate for a total of nine replicates per organism. Average concentrations for each organism at each incubation time are shown in Table S1. A negative blood matrix specimen served as control.
Matrix equivalency
We evaluated the impact of 12 different bottle matrices from three manufacturers on assay performance at clinically relevant organism concentrations. Each matrix was tested with negative blood matrix, two positive control panels containing a total of six pathogenic fungi (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. neoformans, C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, and C. kefyr), and five off-panel bacterial strains (Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus). The concentrations of organisms in the fungal and bacterial panels were 4.4 × 10^5^ CFU/mL for C. albicans, 1.2 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. tropicalis, 1.84 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. neoformans, 3.8 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. glabrata, 1.86 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. guilliermondii, 6.3 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. kefyr, and 1 × 10^8^ CFU/mL for all of the bacteria. The compatible blood culture bottle matrices are listed in Table S2.
Limit of detection
An LoD study was performed to determine the analytical sensitivity of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay. Two strains of each organism corresponding to a single species target and one strain of each organism corresponding to a combined species target included in the assay were tested (28 total strains). Twenty replicates were tested per strain, and the LoD was defined as the lowest concentration at which ≥95% (≥19 out of 20) of samples tested positive.
Analytical reactivity (inclusivity)
Analytical reactivity of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was assessed using 80 total strains, 5 strains for each of the 16 yeast species included in the assay. Each strain was prepared to a concentration representative of a positive blood culture bottle and tested in triplicate. The prepared concentrations were the same for each strain tested within a species, and the concentrations tested for each of the 16 yeast species ranged from 4.4 × 10^5^ CFU/mL for C. albicans to 2.2 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. lusitaniae.
Analytical specificity (cross-reactivity)
Analytical cross-reactivity was evaluated by using the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay to attempt detection of off-panel and potentially cross-reactive organisms, including those phylogenetically related to the on-panel organisms and organisms likely to be present in blood culture samples. Forty off-panel bacteria and 37 off-panel yeast species were tested at clinically relevant concentrations. Bacteria were tested at concentrations of 1 × 10^8^ CFU/mL, with the exception of Micrococcus luteus (8.9 × 10^6^ CFU/mL) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (8.9 × 10^7^ CFU/mL), which were tested at the concentration achieved by culture. Yeasts were tested at concentrations of 1 × 10^7^ CFU/mL, with the exception of Talaromyces marneffei (ATCC 18224), which was provided at a concentration of 1.45 × 10^6^ spores/mL. See Table S3 for a list of bacterial and fungal organisms tested.
Interfering substances
An interfering substance study evaluated potential effects of non-microbial assay interference by 18 substances consisting of 5 endogenous substances (unconjugated bilirubin, conjugated bilirubin, hemoglobin, intralipid/triglycerides, and γ-globulin) and 13 exogenous substances (sodium polyanethol sulfonate, amoxicillin clavulanate, amphotericin B, caspofungin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, flucytosine, gentamicin sulfate, heparin, imipenem, tetracycline, and vancomycin), which may be present during collection or within clinical blood samples. Two positive panels containing three on-panel organisms each (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. neoformans and C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, and C. kefyr) and negative blood matrix were used to test each interfering substance at clinically relevant concentrations. Interfering substances and concentrations tested are shown in Table S4.
Carry-over/cross-contamination
High-positive C. lusitaniae samples (ring-positive plus an additional 8 h incubation of blood culture) and negative samples (negative blood matrix) were assayed in an alternating series by two operators. Immediately following the testing of a positive sample, a negative sample was run in the same bay to evaluate carry-over contamination. This alternating pattern was continued over five consecutive runs across two LIAISON PLEX instruments for a total of 30 positive and 30 negative tests.
Competitive inhibition/co-infection and microbial interference
The impact of high-concentration on-panel fungal co-infection and high-concentration off-panel bacterial co-infection on low-concentration on-panel fungal target detection was evaluated. Representative organisms were grown to blood culture bottle positivity (C. albicans at 4.4 × 10^5^ CFU/mL, C. glabrata at 3.8 × 10^6^ CFU/mL, and C. parapsilosis at 1.5 × 10^7^ CFU/mL) and were tested in pair-wise combinations with three highly concentrated (ring positive plus an additional 8 h incubation) on-panel fungi (C. albicans at 1.7 × 10^7^ CFU/mL, C. glabrata at 1.6 × 10^8^ CFU/mL, and C. parapsilosis at 5.5 × 10^7^ CFU/mL) and nine highly concentrated (all at 1 × 10^8^ CFU/mL) potentially interfering bacteria. The 33 pairwise combinations were tested in triplicate for a total of 99 replicates.
Multisite reproducibility
Site-to-site reproducibility of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was evaluated by testing one lot of BCY Assay cartridges by two operators at each of three testing sites. Four samples included (i) negative blood matrix; (ii) contrived negative sample containing an off-panel bacteria (E. coli at 1 × 10^8^ CFU/mL) and a positive target panel containing three on-panel targets (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. neoformans) prepared to (iii) ring-positive (4.3 × 10^5^ CFU/mL for C. albicans, 1.2 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. tropicalis, and 1.84 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. neoformans); and (iv) ring-positive plus 8 h additional incubation (1.54 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. albicans, 3.9 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. tropicalis, and 5.5 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. neoformans) concentrations. Samples were randomized and blinded to the operators, and each operator tested each sample concentration in triplicate on each of five non-consecutive testing days.
Within-laboratory precision/repeatability
Inter-operator precision at a single site was evaluated across two operators, two LIAISON PLEX Systems, and one lot of BCY Assay cartridges. Four samples included (i) negative blood matrix; (ii) contrived negative sample containing an off-panel bacteria (E. coli) and a positive target panel containing three on-panel targets (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. neoformans) prepared to (iii) ring positive (4.3 × 10^5^ CFU/mL for C. albicans, 1.2 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. tropicalis, and 1.84 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. neoformans) and (iv) ring-positive plus 8 h additional incubation (1.54 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. albicans, 3.9 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. tropicalis, and 5.5 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. neoformans) concentrations. Samples were randomized and blinded to the operators, and each operator tested each sample concentration in triplicate on each of five non-consecutive testing days.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as n (%) or value ± 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as indicated. Statistical software included SAS v.9.4 (SAS Corp, Cary, NC).
RESULTS
Clinical trial subject and specimen details
Demographic and sample details for included prospective and pre-selected specimens are shown in Table 1. Of 70 prospectively enrolled specimens, one was disqualified from analysis due to an inconclusive Gram stain result. No specimen in the pre-selected cohort was disqualified for any reason. Of the 837 samples enrolled in the contrived cohort, 8 (0.96%) were excluded from analysis due to incorrectly labeled stock material.
Clinical performance
The clinical performance of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was compared to the standard of care culture-based/MALDI-TOF identification methods at the clinical sites for all targets. Of the 132 prospective (n = 69) and pre-selected (n = 63) specimens included in the study analysis, 130 (98.5%) generated valid results (i.e., detected or not detected) on the first attempt. Two samples generated invalid results on the first attempt, and both gave no call due to internal control failure. Of the two samples (1.5%) with initially invalid results, both produced valid assay results after a single retest. Allowing a single retest of any initially invalid results, all 132 specimens yielded valid BCY Assay results for a final success rate of 100%. Cumulative clinical performance data (sensitivity/positive percent agreement [PPA] and specificity/negative percent agreement [NPA], with 95% CIs) of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay versus the reference method are shown in Table 2 for combined prospective plus pre-selected specimens. Sensitivity/PPA was 100% for all detected fungal pathogens, and specificity/NPA was 97.6%‒100% for all pathogens. Three of five samples positive by the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay but negative by the reference method were confirmed positive by the BCID2 molecular assay, indicating a true detection. Of the 132 prospective and pre-selected samples, 42 were cultured on the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO instrument with BACT/ALERT FA Plus media (bioMérieux, Durham, NC), 61 on BD BACTEC with BD BACTEC Lytic Anaerobic and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic media (Becton, Dickinson and Company), and five on BACT/ALERT 3D with BACT/ALERT SA Standard Aerobic, BACT/ALERT SN Standard Anaerobic, and BACT/ALERT PF Plus.
The top-three most commonly detected fungal pathogens in the prospectively collected US sample set were C. glabrata at 36% (n = 25/69), C. albicans at 25% (n = 17/69), and C. parapsilosis at 16% (n = 11/69); collectively accounting for 77% of identified infections. C. auris was identified in 6% (n = 4/69) of prospectively collected specimens, and Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii was not identified in this cohort. Assay performance was nearly indistinguishable between prospective versus pre-selected specimens, for all fungal pathogen targets (Table S5).
Of the 829 specimens included in the contrived study analysis, 803 specimens (96.9%) generated valid LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay results (i.e., detected or not detected) on the first attempt (Table 3). For the 26 specimens that were initially invalid, 17 were due to aborted runs caused by instrument issues, and 9 had no call due to internal control failure. Of the 26 specimens retested (3.1%), 24 specimens generated a valid result after a single retest for a final success rate of 99.7% (827 out of 829). The PPA was 100% for all fungal pathogens, and the NPA was 99.6%‒100.0%.
Multiple organisms were detected in six prospective specimens. All six co-infections contained two organisms. Of these, one was concordant with the reference method, and five contained one organism that was not detected by the reference method, but three of these were detected by the BCID2 molecular assay (Table 4).
One prospective sample contained Candida orthopsilosis as identified by the standard of care testing methods but was negative on the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay as this organism was not included on the panel.
Target detectability
The LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay demonstrated 100% positivity in detecting 14 fungal pathogen target-positive samples and 0% positivity when tested with negative blood (Table S1). Average fungal concentration at ring positive ranged from 4.37 × 10^5^ CFU/mL for C. albicans to 3.61 × 10^7^ CFU/mL for C. lusitaniae, and ring positive plus 8 h additional incubation ranged from 4.10 × 10^6^ CFU/mL for C. lipolytica to 1.47 × 10^8^ CFU/mL for C. glabrata. The average concentrations for each target across the three replicate blood cultures at ring positive and ring positive plus 8 h additional incubation are shown in Table S1.
Matrix equivalency
A matrix equivalency study was conducted to evaluate 12 different blood culture bottle matrices. All bottles demonstrated 100% detection of six fungal pathogens (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. neoformans, C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, and C. kefyr), with 0% false detection of five bacterial strains (A. baumannii, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus) or negative blood cultures. Additionally, the BioMérieux BACT/Alert FA Plus was used during the analytical testing of this assay and was also considered compatible. Thus, 13 bottle types tested provided expected results and were deemed compatible with the LIAISON PLEX Yeast BCY (Table S2).
Limit of detection
The LoD for targets ranged from a low concentration (highest sensitivity) of 7.77 × 10^2^ CFU/mL for one Candida famata variant (ATCC 20278) to a high concentration of 2.83 × 10^5^ CFU/mL for one Candida albicans variant (ATCC 14053) (Table S6).
Analytical reactivity (inclusivity)
The LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay identified all 80 fungal strains tested, which included 5 strains for each of the 16 yeast species included in the assay, indicating a high degree of inclusivity (data not shown).
Analytical specificity (cross-reactivity)
None of the 40 bacterial species cross-reacted with any fungal target in the BCY Assay (Table S3). Of the 37 off-panel fungi tested, none cross-reacted with any fungal target in the BCY Assay with the exception of Candida (Yarrowia) deformans, which had 100% detection for the BCY target, Candida lipolytica, when tested at concentrations greater than 1.0 × 10^4^ CFU/mL, and Candida pseudohaemulonii, which had 100% detection for the BCY target, Candida haemulonii/C. duobushaemulonii, when tested at concentrations greater than 1.0 × 10^2^ CFU/mL (Table S3). These cross-reacting targets were predicted by in silico analysis of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay oligo designs (data not shown).
Competitive inhibition/co-infection and microbial interference
Low concentrations (ring-positive) of three on-panel fungal targets were detected 100% of the time when co-assayed in the presence of high concentrations of any of three different on-panel fungal targets (n = 18 cumulative determinations, Table 5) and 100% of the time in the presence of high concentrations of any of nine potential bacterial interferents (n = 81 cumulative determinations, Table S7).
Interfering substances
Six on-panel fungal targets (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. neoformans, C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, and C. kefyr) were used to evaluate the impact of 18 potentially interfering substances, including 5 endogenous substances and 13 exogenous substances (as shown in Table S4), that could be present in clinical blood samples. At the concentrations tested (Table S4), none of the 18 potentially interfering substances (0.0%) interfered with the performance of the LIAISON PLEX BCY. However, fluconazole showed interference when it was tested at a concentration of 25 mg/L and resulted in a false-negative result for C. albicans.
Multisite reproducibility
Overall percent agreement across a total of six operators at three sites was 99.7% for both positive and negative samples when tested by the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay (Table S8). The sole incongruity was a single C. albicans sample at 4.3 × 10^5^ CFU/mL that was missed (false negative) by one operator at one site.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrated the outstanding analytical and clinical performance of the LIAISON PLEX Yeast Blood Culture assay for detection and identification of 16 yeast species in positive blood cultures. Quick and accurate identification of the specific pathogen(s) responsible for bloodstream infection is essential for timely initiation of the most appropriate antimicrobial therapeutic regimen. The LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay quickly and non-invasively confirms and expands fungal pathogen information from initially positive blood cultures, which may improve patient outcomes by informing the timely selection of the most appropriate medical treatment.
Analytical performance of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was excellent, as demonstrated by the reliable detection of multiple strains of each fungal target (i.e., high inclusivity), compatibility with 13 commonly employed culture bottle/matrix combinations, minimal cross-reactivity with off-panel organisms, and the ability to detect on-panel organisms in the presence of high concentrations of potentially interfering or competing microorganisms. In analytical assessments, 97% of specimens generated valid results on the first attempt; after a single retest of inconclusive samples using a new assay cartridge, the final success rate was 99.7%. Inter-site and inter-operator reproducibility were consistently 100%, reflecting the technical simplicity of the streamlined multiplex assay system.
Cross-reactivity was observed with two organisms. Off-panel Candida (Yarrowia) deformans was erroneously identified by the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay as on-panel Candida lipolytica when tested at high concentrations, and the assay misidentified off-panel Candida pseudohaemulonii as Candida haemulonii/C. duobushaemulonii. Both of these cross-reactions were predicted by in silico analyses of the assay’s oligonucleotide sequences. Candida (Yarrowia) deformans is phenotypically similar to Candida lipolytica (also known as Yarrowia lipolytica), but the Candida (Yarrowia) deformans sp. is not a known mammalian pathogen. Candida lipolytica is an emergent and rare opportunistic pathogen that has been occasionally identified in eye, foodborne, and intravascular catheter-related infections (17). Candida pseudohaemulonii, C. haemulonii, and C. duobushaemulonii are all members of the Metschnikowiaceae clade of pathogenic yeasts closely related to C. auris (18). These fungal pathogens are all rare opportunists of tropical American origin, noted for broad intrinsic antifungal resistance (including against fluconazole and amphotericin B) and a high mortality rate. Bloodborne infection by off-panel C. pseudohaemulonii currently occurs much less frequently than infection by other related on-panel members of the C. haemulonii complex, but is probably clinically equivalent (18). Importantly, the BCY nucleic acid assay reliably differentiated C. auris from C. haemulonii complex members, a misidentification that commonly occurs when relying on culture methods alone for characterization (19). The BCY Assay consistently detected multiple strains of all on-panel fungal targets, and test performance was unaffected by the presence of various bacteria or off-panel fungi. No interference was observed in the simultaneous detection of combinations of on-panel fungi at varying concentrations, suggesting good BCY Assay performance in identifying polyfungal bloodstream infections.
Assay performance was unaffected by the inclusion of high concentrations of all endogenous and nearly all exogenous chemical additives that were tested (Table S4). Only fluconazole at 25 mg/L caused interference with C. albicans identification, resulting in a false-negative call. While this concentration approximates the median serum levels observed with high-dosage fluconazole therapy (e.g., 34‒35 µg/mL at 600‒800 mg/day dosing), it is unlikely that these drug levels will be encountered in diluted blood culture broth tested by the BCY Assay (20). No interference was observed by fluconazole at lower concentrations (e.g., 8.3 mg/L; Table S4). No interference occurred for any of the 16 on-panel fungal pathogens by other common antifungal agents (e.g., amphotericin B and caspofungin) or antibacterial drugs tested (Table S4), suggesting good assay performance with blood culture broth samples derived from patients who may be receiving antimicrobial therapy.
The outstanding clinical performance of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was evidenced by achieving 100% sensitivity/PPA and ≥97.6% specificity/NPA for accurate identification of all target organisms in prospective, pre-selected, and contrived specimens. Three of the five false positive results from the prospective and pre-selected sample set (1/1 C. albicans, 1/1 C. parapsilosis, and 1/3 C. tropicalis) were confirmed as positive by the BCID2 molecular assay. Curiously, in the contrived sample set, none of the five false positive results (1/1 C. famata, 1/1 C. parapsilosis, and 3/3 C. tropicalis) could be confirmed by another method. The C. famata sample was not further tested, but BCID2 was used for additional testing of the C. parapsilosis and the three C. tropicalis samples. C. tropicalis had the lowest NPA overall at 95.2% (60/63) for the prospective sample set and 99.6% (775/778) for the contrived sample set. Of the total six false positive results, one was confirmed positive by the BCID2 assay, but the remaining five could not be confirmed as positive by another method. Assay performance was unaffected by the blood culture instrument or media type used and included BACT/ALERT VIRTUO, BD BACTEC™, and BACT/ALERT 3D blood culture systems for the prospective and pre-selected samples. While most post-culture fungal testing seeks to characterize a single suspected pathogen, the multiplex BCY Assay simultaneously analyzes samples for the presence of up to 16 known fungal pathogens, 8 of which are included in the WHO priority pathogen listing (8). Furthermore, the comprehensive fungal pathogen coverage of the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay was confirmed in the prospective sample set where only one of 69 positive blood cultures contained a fungal pathogen (Candida orthopsilosis) that is not included in the panel targets.
The specific fungal pathogens responsible for bloodstream infection exhibit both geographic and temporal variance (2, 4, 21). For example, C. albicans was the causative pathogen for 70–80% of invasive candidiasis infections globally in the 1980s–1990s (22), but this proportion has now decreased to 40–60% in most areas (23). Also, susceptibility to infection by certain Candida spp. varies according to patient medical conditions and antimicrobial regimens; e.g., C. glabrata is more commonly isolated in patients with cancer, and C. krusei tends to affect patients with hematologic malignancy who receive prophylactic fluconazole (24). In our 69 prospective patient samples collected in the US, C. glabrata was the most frequently identified species (36%), followed by C. albicans (25%), and C. parapsilosis (16%). Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii was not identified in this cohort. The LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay offers clinicians a tailored diagnostic tool whereby fungal testing can be specified to evaluate only the pathogens most likely to be encountered, according to the Gram stain result.
As an adjunctive qualitative test, this assay is meant to provide rapid confirmation and clarification of positive continuous blood culture findings and not serve as a standalone diagnostic tool. While accurate identification was demonstrated for 5 tested sequence variants of each of the 16 assay targets, there still remains a risk of false-negative findings with other untested fungal sequence variants. A negative finding for all 16 BCY Assay targets does not preclude the possibility of infection by a fungus included in the test panel or of co-infection with other viruses and bacteria. It is possible that BCY Assay results may be affected by concurrent antimicrobial therapy or that levels of fungi in specimens are below the test’s limit of detection. Last, although this assay was shown to be compatible with pediatric culture bottles, it has not been validated for performance in pediatric patients, so test suitability for young patients is left to physician discretion. Strengths of this study included the multicenter prospective design and comprehensive performance assessment.
Other rapid syndromic molecular panels are also available for the qualitative detection and differentiation of fungal pathogens in blood cultures. The Roche cobas (GenMark Dx) ePlex Blood Culture Identification Fungal Pathogen Panel (BCID-FP) includes 15 fungal targets. As compared to the LIAISON PLEX BCY Assay, BCID-FP does not include C. haemulonii/C. duobushaemulonii or C. lipolytica, but it differentiates C. neoformans and C. gattii and includes Fusarium and Rhodotorula, which are not present in LIAISON PLEX BCY. As reported by Zhang et al., the BCID-FP panel demonstrated similar high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fungal pathogens in positive blood cultures, with sensitivities ranging from 97.1% to 100.0% and specificities from 99.8% to 100.0% (25). BCID-FP has a similarly fast workflow with 2 minute hands-on time and 1.5 h time-to-result (25, 26), as compared to a 1 minute hands-on time and 2 h to result for LIAISON PLEX BCY. The bioMérieux BIOFIRE BCID2 Panel, which was used for confirmatory testing in this study, includes 43 targets in a single panel for the detection and differentiation of bacteria, yeast, and antimicrobial resistance genes from positive blood cultures. The panel includes seven yeast species that correspond to targets present in LIAISON PLEX BCY (C. albicans, C. auris, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. neoformans/C. gattii). In the multicenter study reported by Rhoads et al., BCID2 had sensitivities of 100% for five of the seven yeast targets that were present in the 1,074 samples that were included in the final analysis (27). Specificities ranged from 99.9% to 100.0%. The BCID2 assay has a time-to-result of approximately 1 h and a hands-on time of ≤10 minutes (27, 28).
In conclusion, this study demonstrated the excellent sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex LIAISON PLEX BCY nucleic acid diagnostic assay for simultaneously evaluating 16 known fungal pathogens in positive blood culture specimens. Although culture techniques remain the gold standard approach for evaluating bloodstream fungal infection, the BCY Assay provides excellent performance in quickly assessing the presence of multiple known pathogenic fungi in positive blood cultures.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Denning DW. 2024. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect Dis 24:e 428–e 438. doi:10.1016/S 1473-3099(23)00692-838224705 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Bays DJ, Jenkins EN, Lyman M, Chiller T, Strong N, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Hoenigl M, Pappas PG, Thompson Iii GR. 2024. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis. Clin Epidemiol 16:549–566. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S 45960039219747 PMC 11366240 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. 2017. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi (Basel) 3:57. doi:10.3390/jof 304005729371573 PMC 5753159 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Wolfgruber S, Sedik S, Klingspor L, Tortorano A, Gow NAR, Lagrou K, Gangneux JP, Maertens J, Meis JF, Lass-Flörl C, Arikan-Akdagli S, Cornely OA, Hoenigl M. 2024. Insights from three pan-European multicentre studies on invasive candida infections and outlook to ECMM Candida IV. Mycopathologia 189:70. doi:10.1007/s 11046-024-00871-039088098 PMC 11294264 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Benedict K, Jackson BR, Chiller T, Beer KD. 2019. Estimation of direct healthcare costs of fungal diseases in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 68:1791–1797. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy 77630204844 PMC 6409199 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Barantsevich N, Barantsevich E. 2022. Diagnosis and treatment of invasive candidiasis. Antibiotics (Basel) 11:718. doi:10.3390/antibiotics 1106071835740125 PMC 9219674 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Kim JS, Cha H, Bahn YS. 2024. Comprehensive overview of Candida auris: an emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen. J Microbiol Biotechnol 34:1365–1375. doi:10.4014/jmb.2404.0404038881183 PMC 11294645 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8World Health Organization. 2022. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240060241
