# Protective eyewear in children with one eye vision loss: compliance and trends

**Authors:** Tal Yahalomi, Daphna Mezad-Koursh, Amir Sternfeld, Miriam Ehrenberg, Anat Bachar Zipori, Gad Dotan

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06720-6 · Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · 2024-12-23

## TL;DR

Many children with poor vision in one eye do not consistently wear protective glasses, despite the risk of losing their better eye.

## Contribution

This study is the first to analyze protective eyewear compliance in children with functional one-eye vision loss, not just anophthalmic patients.

## Key findings

- Only 35% of children wore safety glasses for at least 90% of the day.
- Common reasons for non-compliance included discomfort, appearance, and cost.
- Compliance increased when glasses also provided optical correction.

## Abstract

Safety glasses are an important measure to prevent blindness, especially in one- eyed patients. However, patient compliance with eye protection is often limited. Unlike previous studies that described protective eyewear wearing in anophthalmic patients, this study analyzed their usage in functionally one-eyed children, having a significantly reduced visual acuity in one eye, determining common obstacles to their use.

A survey-based study analyzing protective eyewear usage in children with one eye vision loss (mean logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity ≤ 0.7).

This study included 83 functionally one-eyed children (44 males), who received a recommendation to wear safety glasses. Ninety-nine percent of their caregivers were aware of this recommendation; however, 31% of them did not know the glasses’ true purpose. Regarding actual usage, only 29 (35%) children wore safety glasses at least 90% of the day, 26 (31%) children wore them part-time (10–90% of the day) and 28 (34%) wore them rarely or never at all (< 10% of the day). Compliance was higher when glasses provided optical correction. Reasons provided for non-compliance included: discomfort, appearance, cost and vision reduction. Many respondents recollected incidents in which the glasses prevented an eye injury, and less commonly an eye injury occurring while the child was not wearing eye protection.

Compliance with safety glasses in functionally one-eyed children is limited. Emphasizing that numerous gaps and barriers need to be bridged to improve eyewear protection in these children to prevent trauma in the better-seeing eye with its devastating lifestyle effect.

Anophthalmic patients often do not wear protective glasses, which are needed to prevent trauma to their only remaining eye.

Anophthalmic patients often do not wear protective glasses, which are needed to prevent trauma to their only remaining eye.

Non-anophthalmic children with reduced visual acuity in one eye use protective glasses even less often, even when doing sports.Common reasons for not wearing safety glasses include: discomfort, dislike of self-appearance with glasses, and lens-induced vision reduction.

Non-anophthalmic children with reduced visual acuity in one eye use protective glasses even less often, even when doing sports.

Common reasons for not wearing safety glasses include: discomfort, dislike of self-appearance with glasses, and lens-induced vision reduction.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** blindness (MESH:D001766), trauma (MESH:D014947), eye injury (MESH:D005131), vision loss (MESH:D014786)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12238169/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12238169/full.md

## References

1 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12238169/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12238169