# Evaluating the necessity of booster sessions in relapse prevention for depression: a longitudinal study

**Authors:** Jón Ingi Hlynsson, Tómas Kristjánsson, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1568141 · Frontiers in Psychology · 2025-06-24

## TL;DR

This study found that booster sessions for depression relapse prevention may not be necessary for most mild-to-moderate cases, as both groups showed similar long-term remission rates.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the limited necessity of booster sessions for depression relapse prevention in mild-to-moderate cases.

## Key findings

- Both groups showed similar depression-free trends over 24 months, with over 95% remission rates.
- Pre-hypothesized predictors of relapse did not significantly differentiate the groups at 24-month follow-up.
- Internet-based psychotherapy may have longer-lasting effects than previously thought.

## Abstract

Major depression is a highly prevalent and heterogenous mental disorder. Although therapeutic advances for major depressive disorder over the past quarter-century have been incremental rather than transformative, booster sessions have been proposed as a means of solidifying acute treatment gains and lowering relapse risk. However, evidence for the effectiveness of these treatment booster sessions remains inconclusive. This study therefore evaluated the long-term effectiveness of relapse prevention treatment booster sessions for major depression.

In a two-arm, parallel-group, maintenance-phase randomized controlled trial (RCT) with repeated longitudinal measures, the sample consisted of participants in Sweden who had received acute treatment for depression (internet-based behavioral activation or physical activity) and were then randomly assigned to either an 8-week relapse prevention program (n = 119) or control group (n = 143). Participants were followed-up for 24-months with both monthly self-report questionnaires (Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item & Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item) and quarterly diagnostic interviews (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview; MINI).

Both the relapse prevention group and control group exhibited similar depression-free trends over the course of the study period, with over 95% of participants in each group maintaining remission at the 24-month follow-up. Furthermore, all pre-hypothesized predictors of relapse were non-significant in differentiating the two groups at 24-month follow-up.

These findings raise the question of whether treatment booster sessions are uniformly advisable for all mild–moderate cases of depression. For instance, preferentially recommending treatment boosters for psychotherapy-naïve individuals with depression may yield greater effects compared to individuals with difficult-to-treat depression. Our findings indicate that the efficacy of behavioral activation and physical activity may be even greater than previously reported, a testament to the lasting effects of internet-based psychotherapy.

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01619930.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** major depression (MONDO:0002009), major depressive disorder (MONDO:0002009)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** mental disorder (MESH:D001523), depression (MESH:D003866), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (MESH:C000726808), Major depression (MESH:D003865)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12236458/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12236458/full.md

## References

74 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12236458/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12236458