Perceptions and practices in urban Burkina Faso: a qualitative study on gestational age estimation among health workers
Anderson Compaoré, Moctar Ouédraogo, Cheick Ahmed Ouattara, Lionel Olivier Ouédraogo, Lishi Deng, Pegdwendé N. Sawadogo, Carl Lachat, Laeticia Celine Toe, Trenton Dailey-Chwalibóg

TL;DR
This study explores how healthcare workers in urban Burkina Faso estimate gestational age and identify preterm births, revealing inconsistencies and challenges in their practices.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the qualitative practices and perceptions of gestational age estimation among health workers in a low-resource setting.
Findings
Health workers use varying definitions for preterm birth, such as gestational age or birth weight.
Limited access to early ultrasound leads to reliance on less accurate methods like fundal height measurements.
Inconsistent documentation and resource shortages hinder effective preterm birth surveillance and care.
Abstract
The DenBalo study in Burkina Faso aimed to examine biological vulnerability in preterm versus full-term newborns but recorded fewer preterm births than expected based on routine health centre statistics. To investigate this discrepancy, a qualitative study was conducted to understand how healthcare workers assess gestational age in urban Burkina Faso. Ten in-depth interviews and four focus groups were conducted with health workers across four centres in Bobo-Dioulasso. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: definitions of preterm birth, gestational age estimation methods, preterm birth reporting, care challenges, and proposed improvements. Health workers varied in their definitions of preterm birth, using either gestational age (<37 weeks) or birth weight (<2.5 kg). Gestational age is often estimated from the last menstrual period, though considered unreliable. While early…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGlobal Maternal and Child Health · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
