Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of ovarian cryopreservation technology among women with ovarian diseases
Faten Mabrouk Nouh, Hasan Abualruz, Amal Khalifa Khalil, Rania Ezzat El-Gobashy, A. M. F. Alasser, Aya Ibrahim Shaban Abdullah, Jebril Al Hrinat, Aseel Ghaleb Hendi, Majdi AL-Zoubi, Tahani Al Rahbeni, Khalid Al-Mugheed, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem

TL;DR
This study explores how much women with ovarian diseases know about oocyte cryopreservation and finds that many have limited knowledge and negative attitudes toward the technology.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the knowledge gaps and negative perceptions of oocyte cryopreservation among women with ovarian diseases.
Findings
59.9% of women had moderate knowledge of oocyte cryopreservation.
55.9% of participants had a negative attitude toward the technology.
Ovarian diseases were linked to infertility and reduced quality of life for many participants.
Abstract
Cryopreservation techniques for laboratory oocytes provide women with increased reproductive options, especially for those facing fertility challenges due to ovarian diseases. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of oocyte cryopreservation (OC) technology among women with ovarian diseases. A cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted involving 202 women, aged 18–45, who were diagnosed with ovarian diseases. Participants were recruited from outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics at the Menoufia University Hospital and Shebin El-Kom Teaching Hospital. Data collection instruments included an online questionnaire, obstetric and gynecological history forms, and structured assessments of knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward oocyte cryopreservation. The findings revealed that 59.9% of the women had a moderate level of knowledge regarding…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Biology and Fertility · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Ovarian function and disorders
