Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Versus Delayed Reconstruction for Skeletally Immature Patients Using a Physeal-Sparing Anatomical Double-Bundle Reconstruction Technique
Kousuke Shiwaku, Tomoyuki Suzuki, Shutaro Fujimoto, Hidenori Otsubo, Takashi Matsumura, Makoto Emori, Atsushi Teramoto

TL;DR
This study compares early and delayed ACL surgery in children, finding similar clinical results but a higher rate of bone angle deformities with early surgery.
Contribution
The study introduces a modified physeal-sparing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique for skeletally immature patients.
Findings
Clinical outcomes were good for both early and delayed ACL reconstruction groups.
Early reconstruction showed a 40% rate of angle deformities greater than 3°.
No patients had leg length discrepancies exceeding 10 mm.
Abstract
Purpose In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury among young patients, non-operative treatments are the common approach. However, meniscal and cartilage damage have been associated with this treatment, highlighting the need to explore surgical procedures for treating pediatric ACL injuries. We employed a modification of the hybrid physeal-sparing and anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in skeletally immature patients. Here, we aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and growth disturbances, between early ACLR (ER) and delayed ACLR (DR) using our modified hybrid physeal-sparing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique in skeletally immature patients. Methods Patients with an ACL injury with open physes following two techniques, were retrospectively included. The patients…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Sports injuries and prevention · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
