# Analyzing the effects of pickling sludge and fly ash valorized cement sand bricks

**Authors:** Amit Bhomia, Srikanta Routroy, Anupam Singhal, Rahul Samyal

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-08359-7 · Scientific Reports · 2025-07-04

## TL;DR

This study explores using stainless-steel pickling sludge and fly ash in cement bricks to reduce environmental impact and improve compressive strength.

## Contribution

The novel approach is co-utilizing SSPS and fly ash as partial substitutes for river sand in cement bricks.

## Key findings

- Bricks with 2.5–10% SSPS and 40–47.5% fly ash achieved up to 28 MPa compressive strength.
- SEM/XRD/XRF analysis showed denser microstructure with fly ash inclusion.
- Valorized bricks were significantly cheaper than control bricks.

## Abstract

The disposal of Stainless-Steel Pickling Sludge (SSPS) in landfills remains an important issue. Utilizing SSPS as construction material mitigates the negative environmental effects associated with its disposal, providing a sustainable solution. This study investigates co-utilization of SSPS and fly ash as partial substitution of river sand on cement sand bricks properties. Nine cement sand bricks compositions, including control mix, were prepared with varying composition of SSPS, fly ash and river sand. Four compositions were developed with SSPS varied from 2.5 to 10% with fixed fly ash content of 50%. Four additional compositions with varying fly ash content from 40 to 47.5% and varying SSPS 2.5–10% content as partial substitution of river sand were prepared. The developed bricks demonstrated that gradual increment of SSPS (2.5–10%) and reduction of fly ash (47.5–40%) proved incremental to the compressive strength up to 28 MPa. In addition, the morphological analysis using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) were conducted for the compositions. The microstructure analysis showed that with inclusion of fly ash, Mix 2 (M2) compositions revealed a dense microstructure validating the sorptivity results as compared to Mix 1 (M1) compositions. Finally, the cost estimation of the waste valorized bricks as compared to the control bricks was observed to be significantly low. The experiment outcomes concluded adoption of SSPS-fly ash waste valorized bricks as a greener alternative to disposal.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** ettringite (MESH:C501337), calcium (MESH:D002118), C-H (MESH:D002126), HF (MESH:D006195), Fe2O3 (MESH:C000499), SiO2 (MESH:D012822), sodium sulphide (MESH:C033479), CSH (-), gold (MESH:D006046), zinc (MESH:D015032), H2SO4 (MESH:C033158), stainless steel (MESH:D013193), lime (MESH:C016538), calcium silicates (MESH:C031293), calcium carbonate (MESH:D002119), Water (MESH:D014867), steel (MESH:D013232), HNO3 (MESH:D017942), Quartz (MESH:D011791), Ni (MESH:D009532), H3PO4 (MESH:C030242), Al2O3 (MESH:D000537), oxide (MESH:D010087), Cr (MESH:D002857), C2S (MESH:C023714)
- **Species:** Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly, species) [taxon 7227]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12227708/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12227708/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12227708/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12227708