# Association of antegonial notch size with craniofacial morphology and masticatory muscle dimensions

**Authors:** Tatiana Sella Tunis, Dana Rachmiel, Yoav Shapinko, Evgeny Weinberg, Waseem Abboud, Israel Hershkovitz

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-08800-x · Scientific Reports · 2025-07-02

## TL;DR

This study found that the antegonial notch is more common and larger in males and does not correlate with facial types or masticatory muscles.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the sex-based variability and lack of functional relationship of the antegonial notch.

## Key findings

- The antegonial notch was absent in 22.7% of males and 35.1% of females.
- Males had a larger antegonial notch size than females (55 mm² vs. 31 mm²).
- No significant association was found between antegonial notch size and masticatory muscle dimensions.

## Abstract

The antegonial notch (AGN) is a structure that has been variably described across studies, with diverse findings regarding its role and association with craniofacial morphology, which is attributed to differing methodologies and the lack of control for sex and size. This study aimed to elucidate the variability of the AGN and examine its association with facial types, skeletal and muscular parameters. This study was carried out using the CT scans of 311 individuals aged 18–95 years. Facial type, skeletal and muscular measurements were recorded. Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were conducted to examine AGN area differences between the sexes and facial types. Spearman correlation was used to explore the relationships between AGN and the skeletal and muscular parameters. AGN was found to be sex dependent: it was absent in 22.7% of males and 35.1% of females; its size was larger in males than in females (55 mm2 vs. 31 mm2) (p < 0.001). The AGN area did not vary between the facial types (p > 0.073). Its size showed weak correlations with skeletal parameters and no associations with masticatory muscles (p > 0.375). Our findings indicate that the AGN is more prevalent and pronounced in males, and that there was no evidence of a functional relationship.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-08800-x.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** craniofacial, temporomandibular joint, or muscle disorders (MESH:D013706), bruxism (MESH:D002012), LFT (MESH:D000094024), SFT (MESH:D005151), trauma (MESH:D014947), unilateral condylar hypoplasia (MESH:C538270), congenital and acquired disorders of the mandibular condyles (MESH:D008338)
- **Chemicals:** AGN (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12223038/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12223038/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12223038