# Comparison between simulated scenarios and Swedish COVID-19 cases throughout the pandemic

**Authors:** Hatef Darabi, Ilias Galanis, Federico Benzi, Gerard Farré Puiggalí, Philip Gerlee, Torbjörn Lundh, Lisa Brouwers

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-08682-z · Scientific Reports · 2025-07-02

## TL;DR

This study evaluates how well simulated scenarios from the Swedish Public Health Agency matched real-world COVID-19 case data over two years.

## Contribution

The study introduces a new Similarity Error metric to assess simulated vs. observed case trends using multiple attributes.

## Key findings

- Seven out of 11 rounds were classified as having similar scenarios using the optimal threshold from ROC analysis.
- The Similarity Error metric effectively captured real-world trends in most simulation rounds.
- PHAS simulations reflected actual case patterns despite the evolving nature of the pandemic.

## Abstract

This study assesses the accuracy of COVID-19 scenarios for new infections produced by the Swedish Public Health Agency (PHAS) from December 1, 2020, to March 20, 2023. We introduce a Similarity Error (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$\:SEr$$\end{document}), which evaluates the dissimilarity between simulated and observed case time series using the following attributes: area under the curves, peak timings, and growth/decline rates before and after peaks. Rather than using an arbitrary cut-off, we used a threshold determined through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, with performance evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), based on true positives identified by visual inspection for categorization. To further evaluate \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$\:SEr$$\end{document}’s effectiveness, we conducted a sensitivity analysis across the full range of possible threshold values within the unit interval. Applying \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
				\usepackage{amsmath}
				\usepackage{wasysym} 
				\usepackage{amsfonts} 
				\usepackage{amssymb} 
				\usepackage{amsbsy}
				\usepackage{mathrsfs}
				\usepackage{upgreek}
				\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
				\begin{document}$$\:SEr$$\end{document} with an optimal threshold determined through ROC-analysis 7 rounds out of 11 rounds were classified as having one or more similar scenarios, including the 6 rounds identified by visual inspection. Our findings indicate that, despite the challenges of a rapidly evolving epidemic, PHAS delivered simulations that reflected real-world trends in most of the rounds.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-08682-z.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infections (MESH:D007239), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12222681/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12222681/full.md

## References

14 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12222681/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12222681