# Opportunity for cost savings with a novel differentiated model of PrEP delivery: a comparative costing analysis of six-month PrEP supported by interim HIV self-testing and standard of care PrEP dispensing in Kenya

**Authors:** Dorothy I. Mangale, Jesse Heitner, Katrina F. Ortblad, Peter Mogere, Catherine Kiptinness, Nelly R. Mugo, Jared M. Baeten, Kenneth Ngure, Ruanne Barnabas

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12891-7 · BMC Health Services Research · 2025-07-01

## TL;DR

A new PrEP delivery model in Kenya that uses six-month dispensing and HIV self-testing is shown to be less costly than the standard three-month approach.

## Contribution

A novel, cost-saving PrEP delivery model using six-month dispensing and HIV self-testing is evaluated and compared to standard care in Kenya.

## Key findings

- The intervention model cost $17.73 per client-month compared to $25.50 for standard care in the trial scenario.
- In the Ministry of Health scenario, the intervention cost $11.94 per client-month versus $14.76 for standard care.
- Personnel time was significantly reduced in the intervention model, contributing to cost savings.

## Abstract

Cost remains an important barrier to HIV pre-exposure prophlyaxis (PrEP) delivery in Africa. Simplified delivery models that reduce costs without compromising PrEP outcomes are needed. The JiPime-JiPrEP trial tested a model of six-month PrEP dispensing supported with interim HIV self-testing (HIVST) and found non-inferior HIV testing, PrEP refilling, and adherence compared to three-month PrEP dispensing and quarterly clinic visits, the standard-of-care (SOC). We estimated the cost of this novel differentiated PrEP delivery model compared to SOC in Kenya.

Using activity-based micro-costing (payer perspective) and time-and-motion observations, we estimated the cost of PrEP delivery (per client-month) in the intervention and SOC between May 2018 to December 2019. Data from budgets and expense reports, published documents, and interviews informed our estimates. We calculated costs over a one-year horizon for: 1) the trial scenario (i.e., costs within the trial), and 2) the Ministy of Health (MOH) scenario (i.e., hypothetical costs at public clinics). Estimates were in 2019 US dollars and excluded research-related costs.

The mean personnel time attributable to PrEP delivery was 76 minutes per visit and 152 minutes projected over a year in the intervention and 54 minutes per visit and 282 minutes per year in the SOC. In the trial scenario, PrEP delivery cost $17.73 per client-month in the intervention (n=2039 PrEP-months) and $25.50 in the SOC (n=913 PrEP-months). The projected cost of PrEP delivery in the MOH scenario was $11.94 in the intervention and $14.76 in the SOC, with the addition of HIVST kits in the intervention more than offset by personnel savings. In this scenario, personnel (intervention: 55%; SOC: 44%) and medication (intervention: 16%; SOC: 32%) were the primary cost drivers. Including serum creatine testing twice a year in the MOH scenario resulted in a slight increase in the cost of PrEP delivery in the intervention ($12.88 per client-month) versus SOC ($16.17 per client-month).

Six-month PrEP with interim HIVST demonstrated lower costs than three-month dispensing, with decreased personnel time. Scale-up of PrEP delivery requires efficient use of limited resources; the savings in this model of PrEP delivery could be redirected towards currently unmet medical needs.

NCT03593629||https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ with the Clinical Trial Registry (Registration date: 2018-07-20).

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-12891-7.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** creatine (MESH:D003401), PrEP (-)
- **Species:** Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (no rank) [taxon 11676]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220747/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220747/full.md

## References

12 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220747/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220747