# Different artificial neural networks for predicting burnout risk in Italian anesthesiologists

**Authors:** Marco Cascella, Alessandro Simonini, Sergio Coluccia, Elena Giovanna Bignami, Gilberto Fiore, Emiliano Petrucci, Alessandro Vergallo, Giacomo Sollecchia, Franco Marinangeli, Roberto Pedone, Alessandro Vittori

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s44158-025-00255-w · Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care · 2025-07-01

## TL;DR

This study uses artificial neural networks to predict burnout risk in Italian anesthesiologists based on occupational and psychological factors.

## Contribution

The novelty lies in applying different dense neural network models to predict burnout in anesthesiologists using a tailored dataset.

## Key findings

- The best model achieved a predictive accuracy of 0.68, with workload and emotional exhaustion as key contributors to burnout.
- No significant performance differences were found among the six tested neural network algorithms.
- High-risk burnout groups showed significantly higher psychological distress scores, indicating greater anxiety and depression.

## Abstract

Burnout (BO) is a serious issue affecting professionals across various sectors, leading to adverse psychological and occupational consequences, even in anesthesiologists. Machine learning, particularly neural networks, can offer effective data-driven approaches to identifying BO risk more accurately. This study aims to develop and evaluate different artificial dense neural network (DNN)-based models to predict BO based on occupational, psychological, and behavioral factors.

A dataset (300 Italian anesthesiologists) comprising workplace stressors, psychological well-being indicators, and demographic variables was used to train DNN models. Model performance was measured using standard evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Statistical tests were adopted to assess differences in prediction across the DNNs.

The best neural architecture achieved a predictive accuracy of 0.68, with key contributors to BO including workload, emotional exhaustion, job dissatisfaction, and lack of work-life balance. Despite substantial differences among the six implemented algorithms, no significant variation in prediction performance was observed.

Psychological distress scores are significantly higher in the high-risk BO group, suggesting greater anxiety, depression, and overall distress in this category. While challenges remain, continued advancements in artificial intelligence and data science promise more effective and personalized mental health care solutions.

Not applicable.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44158-025-00255-w.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), BO (MESH:D002055), depression (MESH:D003866)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220590/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220590/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220590/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12220590