[Corrigendum] Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote proliferation and migration in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells through activation of the ERK pathway
Tao Li, Chunfu Zhang, Yanling Ding, Wei Zhai, Kui Liu, Fan Bu, Tao Tu, Lingxian Sun, Wei Zhu, Fangfang Zhou, Wenkai Qi, Jiabo Hu, Huabiao Chen, Xiaochun Sun
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMesenchymal stem cell research
Oncol Rep 34: 1469–1477, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4109
Subsequently to the publication of the above paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that a pair of data panels appeared to contain overlapping data in each of Fig. 3A and C on p. 1473, showing the results of Transwell migration and scratch-wound assay experiments respectively, where the data panels were intended to have shown the results from differently performed experiments; moreover, control GAPDH western blotting data featured in Fig. 4B and 5A appeared to be matching, albeit the bands had been inserted into these figure parts in reversed orientations.
The authors were able to re-examine their original data, and realized that errors had occurred in the assembly of these figures through mislabelling of certain of their data files. Owing to the time that had passed since this paper was published, the authors offered to repeat the affected experiments, and the revised versions of Figs. 3, 4 and 5, showing new data for Figs. 3A, 3C, 4B and 5A, are shown on the next two pages. Given that the new experiments yielded data that were not significantly different from those obtained previously, the authors wish to emphasize that the re-presentation of these figures with the new data does not affect the overall conclusions reported in the paper. The authors are grateful to the Editor of Oncology Reports for allowing them the opportunity to publish this corrigendum, and all the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum; moreover, they apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused.