Investigation of digital and conventional methods for verifying the fitness of CAD/CAM crowns on abutments with different shapes

TL;DR

This study compares digital and traditional methods for checking how well dental crowns fit on different abutment shapes.

Contribution

A novel digital-detection technique is introduced and shown to be more accurate than conventional silicone methods for crown fit verification.

Findings

Digital-detection technique showed values closer to the intended 70 μm cement space.

Silicone-compatibility technique had greater variability in measurements.

Digital method performed better or equally on different abutment regions.

Abstract

To evaluate the marginal and internal compatibility of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing crowns produced via a digital workflow using an intraoral scanner, and to compare this digital-detection technique with the conventional fit test using silicone rubber (silicone-compatibility technique) on various abutments.

Implant bodies were placed in the maxillary right central incisor and mandibular right first molar of reference models. Digital scans were acquired using an intraoral scanner, and abutments were prepared. Twenty-four crowns with a cement space of 70 μm were fabricated from the digital file of the abutment. The crown’s inner surface, abutment, and occlusal surface were scanned. The gaps between the crown and abutment were measured using stereoscopic image analysis software based on standard triangulated language data, and the accuracy of the fit was verified using silicone rubber.

Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed between the silicone-compatibility and digital-detection techniques for the maxillary central incisor at the incisal edge and the palatal lower region, and for the mandibular first molar at the occlusal surface and the center of lingual axis. The digital-detection technique yielded values closer to 70 μm for the cement space. The values measured using the silicone-compatibility technique exhibited greater variation than those measured using the digital-detection technique.

The novel digital-detection technique had superior or equivalent performance compared to the silicone-compatibility technique and could be beneficial for verifying crown fitness accuracy.

Figures