Padel vs. tennis doubles: a comparison of performance demands and game attributes

TL;DR

This study compares physical and performance demands between padel and tennis doubles, revealing differences in movement, strokes, and rally patterns.

Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence on the distinct performance characteristics of padel and tennis doubles through direct comparison of national-level players.

Findings

Tennis involves greater movement distances, higher speeds, and longer rest intervals compared to padel.

Padel features more rallies, volleys, and ground strokes with longer play durations.

Both sports show comparable physiological demands despite differing physical performance metrics.

Abstract

This study investigates differences in performance demands and match characteristics between padel and tennis doubles.

Eight national-level male players (age of 27.0 ± 7.4 years, height of 186.3 ± 7.7 cm, body mass of 81.5 ± 10.7 kg, training frequency of tennis 4.8 ± 1.6 and padel 4.9 ± 1.4 h/week) participated in a total of 12 simulated matches, consisting of six tennis doubles and six padel sessions. The sessions were analyzed to assess various performance and physiological metrics. Match analysis focused on rally duration, strokes per rally, and movement characteristics, measured through standardized methods. Statistical comparisons were conducted using linear mixed models to identify significant differences between performance demands and match characteristics that define Padel and Tennis players.

Results indicate that tennis involves greater movement distances, higher speeds, more sprints, and longer rest intervals between rallies. In contrast, padel matches featured a higher total number of rallies, more frequent volleys and ground strokes, and longer play durations. All variables compared between Tennis and Padel showed statistical differences (p < 0.05). Despite these disparities, average heart rate and lactic acid responses were comparable across both sports, indicating similar physiological demands.

These findings highlight the importance of sport-specific training regimens tailored to the unique requirements of each sport. Practical applications include optimizing training to enhance endurance and tactical adaptability for Padel players, while emphasizing explosive power and recovery strategies for Tennis athletes.

Figures