# Comparative analysis of thrombocytopenia incidence in patients treated with generic vs. brand-name linezolid: a cohort study utilizing hospital electronic medical records

**Authors:** Zhizhou Wang, Ke Wang, Yiming Hua, Xin Hu, Xiaotong Zhang, Xiaoxi Li, Xiaoxuan Xing, Yingnan Feng, Chao Wu, Zhichao Zhang, Xianzhe Dong, Lan Zhang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1528633 · Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2025-06-18

## TL;DR

This study found that generic and brand-name linezolid have similar risks of causing low platelet counts in patients.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence comparing hematological safety of generic and brand-name linezolid.

## Key findings

- No significant difference in thrombocytopenia incidence between generic and brand-name linezolid.
- Similar rates of severe thrombocytopenia and anemia in both groups.
- Platelet and hemoglobin level changes were not significantly different between the two drug forms.

## Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the hematological safety of generic linezolid, providing data to support its rational and safe use in clinical practice.

Data were collected from electronic medical records at a tertiary hospital in China between January 2019 and June 2023. We conducted a real-world, retrospective matched cohort study involving hospitalized patients treated with either generic or brand-name linezolid for bacterial infections. Propensity score matching was employed to control for potential risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia. The primary outcome was the incidence of thrombocytopenia adverse events. Secondary outcomes included rates of severe thrombocytopenia, the incidence of anemia meeting transfusion thresholds, and changes in platelet counts (PLTs) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels during follow-up.

A total of 218 patients received generic linezolid, while 222 patients received the brand-name version. After adjustment, each group had 137 patients. There were no significant differences in thrombocytopenia (28.44% vs. 21.17%), severe thrombocytopenia (6.42% vs. 4.95%), or anemia rates (2.75% vs. 3.15%) (P > 0.05). Similarly, reductions in PLT and HB levels during follow-up did not differ significantly (P > 0.05).

Our results indicate no significant differences in the incidence of thrombocytopenia and severe anemia between generic and brand-name linezolid, highlighting the need for further validation in other generic formulations and diverse patient populations.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** linezolid (PubChem CID 3929)
- **Diseases:** thrombocytopenia (MONDO:0002049), anemia (MONDO:0002280)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** bacterial infections (MESH:D001424), anemia (MESH:D000740), thrombocytopenia (MESH:D013921)
- **Chemicals:** linezolid (MESH:D000069349)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213584/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213584/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213584/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213584