# Etiology and patterns of mandibular fractures in cats

**Authors:** Ana C. Castejón-González, Darko Stefanovski, Alexander M. Reiter

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1613902 · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025-06-18

## TL;DR

This study examines the causes and patterns of jaw fractures in cats to improve surgical treatment options.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific fracture patterns and their association with etiology using 3D printing in cats.

## Key findings

- The most common fracture location was the mandibular ramus, followed by the condylar process.
- Three main fracture patterns were identified, accounting for 75% of mandibular ramus fractures.
- Animal altercations were strongly associated with Pattern A fractures.

## Abstract

Mandibular fractures resulting from maxillofacial trauma often require surgical intervention to promote proper bone healing. Understanding the etiology and patterns of mandibular fractures is crucial for selecting appropriate surgical treatment options. The objectives of this study were (1) to examine the etiology and location of mandibular fractures at and distal to the mandibular canine tooth and (2) to identify patterns and risk factors associated with these fractures in client-owned cats.

Medical records and computed tomography (CT) scans of cats with at least one mandibular fracture located at or distal to the mandibular canine tooth were reviewed. The CT images of mandibles with ramus fractures were segmented and reconstructed into 3D models using the Mimics Innovation Suite (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). These models were then printed in white or clear resin using an SLA 3D printer (Formlabs©) to identify fracture patterns.

A total of 38 cats with 62 mandibular fractures were included in the study. The most common fracture location was the mandibular ramus (51.6%, excluding the condylar process), followed by the condylar process (33.9%). Fractures were often severely displaced and fragmented. The evaluation of the 3D-printed models identified three main patterns, which accounted for 75% of the fractures in the mandibular ramus. Fracture etiology was significantly associated with the pattern type (p = 0.028). Animal altercations were 9.3 times more likely to cause a pattern A fracture than an unknown cause.

3D printing was useful for visualizing and describing the patterns of mandibular fractures in cats. Pattern A fractures were most commonly associated with animal altercations.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Felis catus (taxon 9685)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Fractures (MESH:D050723), maxillofacial trauma (MESH:D008446), displaced (MESH:D006617), Mandibular fractures (MESH:D008337)
- **Species:** Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615], Felis catus (cat, species) [taxon 9685]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213421/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213421/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213421/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12213421