Response to Letter to the Editor from Finsterer “Diverse Phenotypes of Mitochondrial Disease With Varying Levels of Heteroplasmy”
Rebecca John, Aaron Chapla, Geeta Chacko, Sangeetha Yoganathan, Maya Mary Thomas, Nihal Thomas

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMitochondrial Function and Pathology · Metabolism and Genetic Disorders · Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Dear Editor,
We are grateful to Prof Finsterer for his keen interest in our case report and his valuable insights on the subject [1]. In this letter, we would like to address some of the concerns brought forward.
We agree with the author of the letter for his valuable comments regarding the role of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number variation, haplotype background, and variants in the nuclear gene influencing the phenotypic variability in mitochondrial disorders. The clinical manifestations in our proband's daughter were myopathy, headache, visual disturbances, cognitive decline, encephalopathy, and seizures. There was a strong family history to suggest a mitochondrial inheritance based on the family pedigree. Her laboratory evaluation revealed lactic acidosis and elevated levels of serum creatine kinase and alanine as well as a muscle biopsy revealing ragged red fibers and absence of cytochrome oxidase (COX) activity [2]. Targeted mitochondrial genome sequencing was considered as she fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for definitive mitochondrial encephalopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS), and targeted testing revealed a pathogenic variant A3243G in the MT-TL1 gene [3]. The phenotypic spectrum, laboratory findings, and genotype were consistent with MELAS. The phenotypic heterogeneity could be explained by the differences in heteroplasmy, tissue distribution, and threshold effect in our proband and her daughter. The m.3243A > G variant in MELAS has been well documented to have diverse clinical phenotypes and severity [4]. However, segregation analysis in the extended family members and comprehensive genetic testing (mtDNA copy number variation, haplotype, and variants in nuclear genes) would provide additional information but were not performed in our proband's family due to the fiscal constraints. As the reviewer had rightly pointed out, comprehensive genetic analysis—including both mitochondrial and nuclear genomes—may provide important insights into the heterogeneity observed in these patients.
There was a strong family history of cardiac events as depicted in the pedigree chart (Fig. 1) in our case report [2]. We follow recommended surveillance for monitoring multisystem complications in individuals with MELAS [4]. Hence, our proband had initial visits and follow-up evaluations with electrocardiogram (ECG), and echocardiography to monitor the progression of the underlying disease and cardiac involvement. Her baseline ECG, Holter monitoring, and echocardiography did not reveal any abnormalities (normal left ventricle [LV] function, no regional wall motion abnormalities, normal LV wall thickness, normal right ventricle [RV] function, all cardiac chambers normal in size). However, a recent echocardiography revealed features that were suggestive of RV free wall thickening (measuring 8 mm), without evidence of pulmonary hypertension or significant anomalies in blood flow. There was no cardiac phenotype related to the patterns that were described in MELAS seen. A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan had been planned; however, the patient had declined prioritizing the procedure as a priority, considering that she was asymptomatic.
Our proband did not have neurological manifestations up to the present time, while her daughter had central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement. As per category B in the diagnostic criteria of MELAS, high plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lactate would be sufficient to establish a diagnosis [3]. Our proband's daughter had high blood lactate and the characteristic muscle biopsy findings; CSF lactate analysis was not carried out, considering the reluctance of the patient's family to proceed with further invasive testing. Her brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) did not reveal a lactate peak. Identifying a lactate peak on MRS has been demonstrated to correlate with mitochondrial disease; however, this finding has not been consistently observed in every patient with mitochondrial disease [5]. However, we acknowledge that the CSF lactate is a reliable measure for the identification of CNS involvement in mitochondrial disease [6].
With regard to whether the index patient had calcification of the basal ganglia, the MRI revealed cerebellar volume loss and no evidence of basal ganglia calcification or cortical involvement. MRS did not reveal a lactate peak.
We agree that performing an autopsy in the index patient's daughter could have provided additional insights; however, culturally and logistically we could not obtain consent for autopsy at the time of death.
With regard to the expression “recurrent episodes of myopathy,” our proband's daughter had episodic muscle pain and proximal muscle weakness precipitated by a febrile illness. A diurnal variation in muscle weakness was not reported. Subsequently, she progressively developed persistent proximal muscle weakness with an elevated serum creatine kinase. Our proband has pancreatic diabetes without any evidence of CNS or PNS involvement to date while her daughter had presented with PNS and CNS involvement. The phenotypic variability in the proband and the daughter may be attributed to the diverse clinical manifestations in individuals with the m.3243A > G variant [7].
As the phenotypic spectrum and severity are highly variable in individuals with the m.3243A > G variant, our proband was counseled regarding the underlying diagnosis, the need for annual surveillance to monitor for disease progression, risk of recurrence, availability of prenatal diagnostic methods, and preimplantation genetic testing. In this instance, additional family members were either unavailable, had not yet provided informed consent, or were deceased, thereby limiting further segregation analysis. As emphasized in our case report, prospective genotypic screening of all available family members is crucial for comprehensive genetic evaluation and counseling [1].
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Finsterer J . Letter to the Editor from Finsterer “Diverse phenotypes of mitochondrial disease with varying levels of heteroplasmy”. JCEM Case Rep. 2025:luaf 127.40599484 10.1210/jcemcr/luaf 127PMC 12209709 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2John R, Chapla A, Chacko G, Yoganathan S, Thomas MM, Thomas N. Diverse phenotypes of mitochondrial disease with varying levels of heteroplasmy. JCEM Case Rep. 2025;3(4):luaf 020.40144477 10.1210/jcemcr/luaf 020PMC 11937956 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Yatsuga S, Povalko N, Nishioka J, et al MELAS: a nationwide prospective cohort study of 96 patients in Japan. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1820(5):619‐624.21443929 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.03.015 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4El-Hattab AW, Almannai M, Scaglia F, et al MELAS. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, eds. Gene Reviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle; 2001:4‐10.
- 5Lin DD, Crawford TO, Barker PB. Proton MR spectroscopy in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected mitochondrial disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(1):33‐41.12533324 PMC 8148941 · pubmed ↗
- 6Yamada K, Toribe Y, Yanagihara K, Mano T, Akagi M, Suzuki Y. Diagnostic accuracy of blood and CSF lactate in identifying children with mitochondrial diseases affecting the central nervous system. Brain Dev. 2012;34(2):92‐97.21875773 10.1016/j.braindev.2011.08.004 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Niedermayr K, Pölzl G, Scholl-Bürgi S, et al Mitochondrial DNA mutation “m.3243 A > G”-heterogeneous clinical picture for cardiologists (“m.3243 A > G”: a phenotypic chameleon). Congenit Heart Dis. 2018;13(5):671‐677.30133155 10.1111/chd.12634 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
