# A computationally efficient approach to false discovery rate control and power maximisation via randomisation and mirror statistic

**Authors:** Marco Molinari, Magne Thoresen

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/09622802251329768 · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · 2025-03-31

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a method combining randomisation and the Mirror Statistic to improve variable selection in high-dimensional models while controlling false discoveries.

## Contribution

A novel approach combining outcome randomisation and the Mirror Statistic for FDR control and power maximisation in high-dimensional regression.

## Key findings

- The proposed method increases statistical power in scenarios with correlated covariates and many active variables.
- It is scalable and computationally efficient, requiring only a single run on the full dataset.
- Simulations show the method effectively combines FDR control with high true positive rates.

## Abstract

Simultaneously performing variable selection and inference in high-dimensional regression models is an open challenge in statistics and machine learning. The increasing availability of vast amounts of variables requires the adoption of specific statistical procedures to accurately select the most important predictors in a high-dimensional space, while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) associated with the variable selection procedure. In this paper, we propose the joint adoption of the Mirror Statistic approach to FDR control, coupled with outcome randomisation to maximise the statistical power of the variable selection procedure, measured through the true positive rate. Through extensive simulations, we show how our proposed strategy allows us to combine the benefits of the two techniques. The Mirror Statistic is a flexible method to control FDR, which only requires mild model assumptions, but requires two sets of independent regression coefficient estimates, usually obtained after splitting the original dataset. Outcome randomisation is an alternative to data splitting that allows to generate two independent outcomes, which can then be used to estimate the coefficients that go into the construction of the Mirror Statistic. The combination of these two approaches provides increased testing power in a number of scenarios, such as highly correlated covariates and high percentages of active variables. Moreover, it is scalable to very high-dimensional problems, since the algorithm has a low memory footprint and only requires a single run on the full dataset, as opposed to iterative alternatives such as multiple data splitting.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** MYLIP (myosin regulatory light chain interacting protein) [NCBI Gene 29116] {aka IDOL, MIR}, TPR (translocated promoter region, nuclear basket protein) [NCBI Gene 7175] {aka MRT79}, ABCG1 (ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 1) [NCBI Gene 9619] {aka ABC8, WHITE1}
- **Diseases:** ORCID iDs (MESH:C535742), atherosclerosis (MESH:D050197), CVDs (MESH:D002318), TG (MESH:C566031), DS (MESH:D010146)
- **Chemicals:** blood glucose (MESH:D001786), cholesterol (MESH:D002784), TGs (MESH:C026285), TG (MESH:D014280)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12209545/full.md

## Figures

10 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12209545/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12209545/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12209545