Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Complications in Transgender Men Undergoing Different Routes of Hysterectomy: A Study Utilizing American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Data
Bashar Hassan, James Antongiovanni, Dana Hazimeh, Alissa Haas, Fan Liang, Stephen Martin

TL;DR
This study compares the 30-day complication rates of different hysterectomy methods in transgender men using a national database.
Contribution
The study is the first to analyze postoperative complications of various hysterectomy approaches specifically in transgender men.
Findings
Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) had the lowest complication rates compared to other methods.
LAVH was associated with a higher risk of unplanned intubation and bleeding requiring transfusion.
Abdominal hysterectomy (AH) showed increased odds of bleeding requiring transfusion.
Abstract
Introduction: Gender-affirming surgeries, including hysterectomy, have been shown to reduce distress and improve quality of life for transgender men. However, the safety and efficacy of different hysterectomy approaches in transgender men have not been extensively studied. Here, we aim to compare postoperative complications among the different hysterectomy approaches in transgender men. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2012 to 2020 to compare 30-day postoperative complications across different routes of hysterectomy in transgender men. Transgender men who underwent hysterectomy were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes for gender dysphoria. Routes of hysterectomy included laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH),…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUterine Myomas and Treatments · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Reproductive Health and Contraception
