From suspicion of cognitive decline to dementia diagnosis: a systematic review of healthcare professionals’ considerations and attitudes
Fleur C W Visser, Marleen Kloppenburg-Lagendijk, Liesbeth Hempenius, Nicolaas A Verwey, Marieke Perry, Marlise E A van Eersel, Barbara C van Munster

TL;DR
This paper reviews how healthcare professionals decide to start dementia testing, highlighting the complex factors influencing their choices.
Contribution
A systematic review of healthcare professionals' considerations and attitudes when initiating dementia diagnostic testing.
Findings
Initiating dementia diagnostic workup is a delicate process influenced by patient, professional, and societal factors.
Healthcare professionals use diverse strategies, shaped by fear, reluctance, and stigma, with no single right approach.
Recommendations include improving communication and promoting collaboration to support professionals in this complex process.
Abstract
Initiating diagnostic testing for dementia is a dynamic and complex process that often involves balancing competing interests. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of healthcare professionals’ considerations and attitudes during the process from suspicion of cognitive decline to deciding to initiate diagnostic testing. Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were systematically searched on 29 January 2024 for qualitative and mixed-methods studies published since 2005. Search concepts were: ‘dementia’, ‘considerations and attitudes’, ‘healthcare professionals’ and ‘diagnosis’. Two screeners independently conducted title/abstract-screening using ASReview (efficient and transparent systematic review machine learning framework), and full-text screening. Findings were analysed by thematic synthesis. Thirty-three studies were included. Most involved primary care…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Patient Dignity and Privacy
