Disparities in multidimensional psychosocial stressors by sexual minority identity among cancer survivors from the All of Us (AoU) Research Program
Angel Arizpe, Nikta Saeedi, Carol Y. Ochoa-Dominguez, Theresa A. Hastert, Alberto Carvajal, Sue E. Kim, Albert J. Farias

TL;DR
Sexual minority cancer survivors report higher stress and less social support, with greater discrimination in states led by Republican governors.
Contribution
This study identifies disparities in psychosocial stressors among sexual minority cancer survivors and links them to political context.
Findings
SM cancer survivors had 46% higher odds of high/medium perceived stress compared to non-SM survivors.
SM survivors had 47% higher odds of low neighborhood social cohesion.
In states with Republican governors, SM survivors had twice the odds of medical discrimination compared to heterosexual survivors.
Abstract
Sexual minority (SM) individuals may face discrimination and psychosocial stressors that can adversely impact their cancer care and outcomes. Therefore, we tested for disparities in psychosocial stressors by SM status among cancer survivors and explored whether observed disparities differ by governor’s political affiliation. Perceived stressors and SM status data from 2018–2022 were obtained from adult cancer survivors identified in the All of Us (AoU) data repository. We evaluated associations between self-reported SM status (heterosexual vs gay, lesbian, bisexual, or other SM minorities) and binary indicators of discrimination in medical settings (any vs. none), perceived stress (high/medium vs low), and neighborhood social cohesion (high/medium vs low) using multivariable logistic regression and stratified models adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates. In our cohort…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Family Support in Illness · Reproductive Health and Technologies
