# Accelerated neurostimulation protocols for auditory hallucinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

## TL;DR

This study reviews and analyzes the effectiveness of accelerated brain stimulation techniques in reducing auditory hallucinations and other symptoms in psychosis.

## Contribution

The paper provides a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing accelerated neurostimulation protocols to traditional ones for treating auditory hallucinations.

## Key findings

- Accelerated protocols showed moderate improvement in auditory hallucinations and positive psychotic symptoms.
- Studies using fMRI guidance and cTBS showed superior results.
- No significant improvement was found for negative symptoms or between treatment and sham groups.

## Abstract

To explore the efficacy and characteristics of accelerated (more than once daily) protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) in treating auditory hallucinations (AH) and other psychotic symptoms.

”We searched Pubmed” using relevant MeSH terms and keywords to identify relevant literature. Standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were used to evaluate the effects of rTMS and tES.

Eighteen studies were included, eight which used rTMS and ten which used tES. AHs and positive psychotic symptoms (PPS) improved in all studies from before to after treatment (SMD = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.77 to 0.51). Superiority was seen in the groups using fMRI guidance and using cTBS. Thirteen studies used a sham group as a control, which collectively showed statistically significant improvement in AHs with a moderate effect size (SMD = 0.34, 95%CI - 0.50 to 0.18). However, these studies included a high level of heterogeneity as measured by Cochran’s Q and I2. Meta-analysis performed showed no consistent improvement of negative symptoms and did not differ significantly between the treatment and sham groups.

There appears to be a therapeutic effect for accelerated neurostimulation protocols for AHs on par with non-accelerated approaches. These protocols take up less overall time and often provide less overall stimulus. This result needs to be confirmed by large-scale randomized controlled trials before this finding can be recommended in clinical practice.

https://osf.io/69azy/, identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/69AZY.