Assessing the reliability of abdominal adiposity measurements by transabdominal ultrasound in first trimester pregnancies with sonographers of varying experience levels
Noppasin Khwankaew, Nattraporn Srisovanna, Ninlapa Pruksanusak, Athanasios Pantelis, Athanasios Pantelis, Athanasios Pantelis, Athanasios Pantelis

TL;DR
This study evaluates how reliably ultrasound can measure abdominal fat in early pregnancy, finding that experienced sonographers provide the most accurate results.
Contribution
The study introduces a reliability assessment of abdominal adiposity measurements in first trimester pregnancies using sonographers with varying experience levels.
Findings
Sonographic measurements of abdominal adiposity showed excellent intraobserver reliability, especially for experienced sonographers.
Visceral fat thickness (VFT) correlated significantly with maternal waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).
Interobserver reliability was excellent except for VFT measurements between the most and least experienced operators.
Abstract
Given the growing evidence linking increased abdominal adiposity in early pregnancy to a higher risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), this study aims to evaluate the reliability of the sonographic measurements of abdominal adiposity during the first trimester of pregnancy, comparing the performance of sonographers with varying levels of experience. A cross-sectional study was conducted on singleton Asian pregnant women with gestational ages between 11 and 14 weeks. Transabdominal ultrasound measurements of abdominal adiposity were performed by three sonographers with different experience levels, including measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT), visceral fat thickness (VFT), and preperitoneal fat thickness (PFT) using three techniques. Intra- and interobserver reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGestational Diabetes Research and Management · Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies · Birth, Development, and Health
