Developing and streamlining clinical trial services to support pediatric drug development across 21 countries in Europe: insights from the conect4children (c4c) network
Sabah Attar, Francisca P. Figueiras, Carla Peacock, Hazel Wohlfahrt, Birgitta C. P. Hüsken, Susan Andrews, Pirkko Lepola, Margaret Patton, Regis Hankard, Eren Halil, Fernando Pontes Soares, Lionel K. Tan, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Mark A. Turner

TL;DR
The c4c network improved clinical trial services for children across 21 European countries, creating scalable and sustainable support for pediatric drug development.
Contribution
A public-private partnership developed and implemented high-quality, standardized trial support services for multinational pediatric trials.
Findings
Multinational coordination of pediatric trials advanced from SRL1 to SRL8 over six years.
Services were deployed through a sustainable non-profit organization, conect4children Stichting.
Variability in site readiness and data collection methods posed challenges to consistent implementation.
Abstract
The efficiency, quality, and scalability of clinical trial support services are essential for the success of multinational clinical trials particularly trials that recruit babies, children, and young people. Through a public private partnership funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 between 2018 and 2025 involving 10 large originator pharmaceutical companies and 33 academic and third sector organizations, the conect4children (c4c) network has developed high-quality trial support services to promote consistent delivery in pediatric trials in over 220 sites across 21 countries, addressing gaps in communication, site identification, feasibility, and trial support. This paper explores the development and implementation of these services, using the Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) and Service Readiness Levels (SRLs) frameworks to measure service progression and operational…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPharmaceutical studies and practices · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
