# Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Ultrasound with Nerve Stimulator-Guided Infraclavicular Block Anesthesia Methods in Pediatric Patients

**Authors:** Abdulhakim Şengel, Evren Büyükfirat, Selçuk Seçilmiş, Nuray Altay, Ahmet Atlas, Abdullah Şengül

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/medicina61060985 · Medicina · 2025-05-27

## TL;DR

This study compares two methods of anesthesia for children's arm surgeries and finds both are safe and effective, with ultrasound alone being just as good as ultrasound plus nerve stimulator.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the efficacy of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block in pediatric patients without the need for a nerve stimulator.

## Key findings

- US-guided ICB had a significantly shorter procedure time compared to US + NS-guided ICB.
- Both methods showed similar durations of motor and sensory block, with low complication rates.
- Opioid and additional analgesia use were comparable between the two groups.

## Abstract

Background and objectives: Brachial plexus block is one of the most effective anesthesia and analgesia methods for upper extremity surgeries across different age groups. However, the number of studies on this block in children is insufficient. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze and discuss the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)- and Ultrasound with nerve stimulator (US + NS)-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) in pediatric patients. Materials and Method: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 240 pediatric patients admitted to our clinic between October 2020 and April 2023, 120 of whom underwent US-guided ICB and 120 who underwent US + NS-guided ICB. Results: Demographic data of both groups who underwent US and US + NS-guided ICB were similar. The mean procedure time was 6.1 ± 0.8 min for the US group and 8.31 ± 0.82 min for the US + NS group (p < 0.001). The mean operative time was 62.4 ± 11.3 min in the US group and 62.4 ± 9.5 min in the US + NS group (p = 0.73). Intraoperative and postoperative opioid and additional analgesia use and pain scores at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 24 h were recorded in both groups. The mean duration of the motor block (MBD) was 6.20 ± 0.95 h in the US group and 6.29 ± 0.88 h in the US + NS group (p = 0.46). The mean duration of sensory block (SBD) was 9.38 ± 2.13 h in the US group and 9.53 ± 2.05 h in the US + NS group (p = 0.38). Conclusions: In pediatric patients, US and US + NS-guided ICB applications are effective and safe in ease of application, prolonged analgesia, and low complication rates. In skilled hands, US-guided ICB can be as effective as US + NS-guided ICB. Further prospective studies with more significant patient populations are needed to validate these findings.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** MBD (MESH:D012080), plexus (MESH:D020288), pain (MESH:D010146), motor block (MESH:D006327), complication (MESH:D008107)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12195188/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12195188/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12195188/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12195188