Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Postoperative Recurrent and Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Observational Study
Yuhei Kurata, Atsuto Mouri, Hisao Imai, Satoshi Endo, Kasumi Tsukamoto, Kenji Masaki, Kosuke Hashimoto, Yu Miura, Ayako Shiono, Ou Yamaguchi, Junichi Nakagawa, Kyoichi Kaira, Kunihiko Kobayashi, Hiroshi Kagamu

TL;DR
This study found that nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment leads to better survival in postoperative recurrent lung cancer patients compared to those with inoperable disease.
Contribution
The study provides real-world evidence comparing outcomes of Nivo-Ipi therapy in postoperative and inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Findings
Postoperative patients had significantly longer overall survival than inoperable patients.
The objective response rate and progression-free survival were similar between the two groups.
Grade ≥3 adverse events were common but did not differ significantly between groups.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The comparative efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo-Ipi) combination therapy between patients with either postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or inoperable stage III/IV NSCLC have yet to be conclusively determined. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients diagnosed with either postoperative recurrent NSCLC or inoperable stage III/IV NSCLC. Both groups, referred to as the postoperative and inoperable cohorts respectively, underwent Nivo-Ipi therapy at four Japanese medical institutions between December 2020 and November 2022. The study’s primary aim was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety outcomes across these two groups. Results: A total of 161 patients received Nivo-Ipi therapy (postoperative group, n = 30; inoperable group, n = 131). The…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
