Perceptions and Practice of Urologists in Saudi Arabia Regarding Sexual Complications Related to LUTS/BPH Management

TL;DR

This study examines how urologists in Saudi Arabia discuss sexual side effects with patients before treating BPH, finding inconsistent communication practices.

Contribution

The study provides insights into urologists' communication patterns regarding sexual complications in BPH management in Saudi Arabia.

Findings

Urologists most frequently discussed ED risks before 5-ARIs and combined therapies, and EjD risks before alpha-blockers and TURP.

A significant proportion of urologists considered alternative treatments based on sexual dysfunction risks.

Private hospital urologists showed a trend toward more open discussions, though not significant in multivariate analysis.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate perceptions and practices of urologists in Saudi Arabia regarding discussions of erectile dysfunction (ED) and ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) with patients before initiating BPH treatments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire distributed during the 36th Saudi Urological Annual Conference held in Riyadh in February 2025 among urologists in Saudi Arabia. A binary outcome variable, “frequent and open discussion,” was created based on a scoring system using the median score of these responses. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and univariate (p < 0.25) and multivariate (p < 0.05) logistic regression using SPSS version 27. Results: Discussions about ED risks were most frequent before prescribing 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) (51.3%) and combined alpha-blockers and 5-ARIs therapy (50.0%), whereas EjD risks were more frequently addressed before alpha-blocker monotherapy (59.2%) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (56.6%). A substantial proportion of urologists discussed alternative treatments based on sexual dysfunction risks, particularly before TURP (53.9%), alpha-blockers (47.4%), and 5-ARIs (43.4%). Univariate analysis revealed a trend towards more open discussions among non-Saudi urologists (OR 4.58, 95% CI 0.88–23.74, p = 0.06) and a significant association with working in private hospitals (OR 3.68, 95% CI 0.39–35.14, p = 0.03). However, these associations did not hold in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Urologists in Saudi Arabia demonstrate variability in discussing sexual complications with patients before BPH treatments. Consistent and comprehensive discussions about ED and EjD risks are crucial for informed patient decision-making. Standardized guidelines and educational programs are needed to enhance urologists’ communication skills and ensure consistent patient counseling.