# Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectal Resection—Experience of a Tertiary Oncology Center

## TL;DR

This study shows that hand-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery is safe and effective when performed by experienced teams, with good outcomes and survival rates.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence on the safety and oncological outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic rectal resection in a tertiary oncology center.

## Key findings

- HALS for rectal resection had a low conversion rate (3.8%) and minimal 30-day mortality (0.9%).
- Anastomotic leak rate was 12.1%, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 82.6%.
- Most patients had cT3-4 tumors, and 96.2% achieved R0 resection.

## Abstract

Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a possible approach for rectal anterior resection (RAR). However, evidence supporting this technique remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of HALS for RAR at a single tertiary oncology center. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a prospectively maintained database. Patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction and rectum who underwent HALS for RAR between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2022 were included. All surgeries were performed by a dedicated colorectal team composed of three surgeons. Results: Among the 1911 surgeries for primary colorectal cancer performed, 469 met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 66 (57–74) years and 63% of the patients were male. Most tumors were cT3-4 (78.9%) and cN+ (71.2%), and neoadjuvant therapy was administered in 70.0% of cases. Low RAR was performed in 73.1% of cases, and an anastomosis was constructed in 95% of cases. The median operative time was 152 (135–180) min, and the conversion rate was 3.8%. Major morbidity occurred in 10.0% of cases, with 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of 0.9% and 1.3%, respectively. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 12.1%, with 9.0% early leaks and 3.1% late leaks. A complete/near-complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 89.6% of cases and an R0 resection in 96.2% of cases. With a median follow-up of 87 months, the locoregional recurrence rate was 2.5%, whereas the distant recurrence rate was 5.9%. The 5-year overall survival was 82.6%. Conclusions: When performed by experienced teams, HALS for RAR is safe and feasible and is associated with a short operative time, low conversion rate, minimal morbidity, and optimal oncologic performance.