# A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial of a Novel Single-Injection Intra-Articular HMDA-Cross-Linked Hyaluronate Gel for Knee Osteoarthritis

## TL;DR

A new hyaluronic acid gel was tested for knee osteoarthritis and found to be as effective and safe as a conventional treatment.

## Contribution

A novel single-injection HMDA-cross-linked hyaluronate gel was evaluated and shown to be non-inferior to BDDE-cross-linked HA in knee OA treatment.

## Key findings

- HMDA-HA demonstrated non-inferior pain reduction compared to BDDE-HA at Week 12.
- Secondary outcomes, including WOMAC scores and global assessments, were comparable between groups.
- Adverse events were reported but no treatment-related drug reactions occurred.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: This Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel hyaluronic acid hydrogel cross-linked with hexamethylenediamine (HMDA-HA) compared to a conventional 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether cross-linked HA (BDDE-HA) in patients with mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: A total of 223 adults (mean age 63.5 years; 167 women) with Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade I–III knee OA were randomised 1:1 to receive two intra-articular injections of HMDA-HA or BDDE-HA at baseline and at 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline in weight-bearing pain (WBP) on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at Week 12, assessed in the per-protocol population. A non-inferiority margin of 10 mm was predefined. Secondary outcomes included global assessments, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index scores, responder rates, and rescue medication use [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06307847]. Results: At Week 12, least squares mean change (standard error [SE]) in WBP was −23.72 (1.88) mm in the HMDA-HA group (n = 83) and −25.99 (1.76) mm in the BDDE-HA group (n = 95), yielding a difference of 2.26 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.83 to 7.34; p = 0.3825), thus demonstrating the non-inferiority of HMDA-HA to BDDE-HA. Secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. A total of 136 adverse events were reported: 44 (41.1%) in the HMDA-HA group and 32 (28.1%) in the BDDE-HA group, with no treatment-related adverse drug reactions. Conclusions: A single-injection intra-articular regimen of HMDA-HA was effective and safe for the treatment of adult patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA.