# Economic assessment of potential changes to essential medicines for diabetes in Uganda

**Authors:** Atousa Bonyani, Tracy K. Lin, Ambrose Jakira, Isaac D. Kimera, Martin Muddu, Jeremy I. Schwartz, James G. Kahn, Sonak D. Pastakia, Sonak D. Pastakia, Sonak D. Pastakia, Sonak D. Pastakia

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326806 · PLOS One · 2025-06-25

## TL;DR

This paper evaluates changes to diabetes medicines in Uganda to reduce costs and improve health outcomes.

## Contribution

The study proposes cost-saving substitutions for diabetes medications in Uganda's essential medicines list.

## Key findings

- Replacing certain OHAs could save the government up to USD 2.65 million annually.
- Using lower doses of some OHAs could save USD 230,000 to USD 600,000 per year.
- Sitagliptin is identified as a cost-effective diabetes medication in Uganda.

## Abstract

The World Health Organization suggests selecting essential medicines based on availability, accessibility, affordability, cost-effectiveness, and safety and efficacy. We examined Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (OHAs) for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Essential Medicines and Health Supplies List for Uganda (EMHSLU), assessed all criteria, and proposed alternative medicines to improve cost-savings and health outcomes.

We conducted a literature review followed by budget impact analysis (BIA) to evaluate potential cost-savings from refining EMHSLU. In our literature review, we identified metrics for measuring availability, accessibility, and affordability of medicines and evaluated evidence on cost-effectiveness, safety, and efficacy of OHAs. According to the country context and available data, we used applicable methods to analyze five classes of OHAs available in Uganda. Since the government covers essential medicines in the public sector based on BIA, we assessed affordability for the government by examining potential savings in two scenarios (#1: shifts within the EMHSLU; #2: use of non-EMHSLU drugs).

OHAs added to the EMHSLU 2023 are less available and accessible compared to OHAs in EMHSLU 2016. BIA scenario 1 revealed that the complete replacement of glimepiride 2 mg and gliclazide 80 mg with glibenclamide 5 mg could save the government up to USD 2.65 million per year. Additionally, scenario 2 showed that full replacement of dapagliflozin 10 mg and glimepiride 4 mg instead of their lower doses can save up to United States Dollar (USD) 230,000 and USD 600,000 per year, respectively. A review and adaptation of a published cost-effectiveness analysis highlights that sitagliptin is a cost-effective OHA in Uganda with an estimated Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio of $6,132/Quality-Adjusted LifeYear.

The findings suggest several potential type 2 diabetes oral medication substitutions which would reduce costs.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** type 2 diabetes mellitus (MONDO:0005148), diabetes (MONDO:0005015)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** type 2 diabetes (MESH:D003924), diabetes (MESH:D003920)
- **Chemicals:** glimepiride (MESH:C057619), gliclazide (MESH:D005907), sitagliptin (MESH:D000068900), OHA (-), dapagliflozin (MESH:C529054), glibenclamide (MESH:D005905)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12193067/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12193067/full.md

## References

76 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12193067/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12193067