# Detection of Di- and Tri-Locus kdr Mutations in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Texas, USA, and the Implications for Insecticide Resistance

**Authors:** Bianca M. Wimmer, Cynthia Reinoso Webb, Steven M. Presley

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/insects16060551 · Insects · 2025-05-23

## TL;DR

This study examines kdr mutations in Aedes mosquitoes from Texas, finding combinations that may increase insecticide resistance and hinder control efforts.

## Contribution

The study identifies di- and tri-locus kdr mutations in Texas Aedes populations and their potential impact on pyrethroid resistance.

## Key findings

- Significant differences in F1534C and V410L mutations between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.
- Di-locus and tri-locus kdr mutations detected in both species, potentially amplifying insecticide resistance.
- No significant difference observed for the V1016I mutation between the two species.

## Abstract

Insecticide resistance caused by knockdown resistant (kdr) mutations is a growing concern for mosquito control. Different mutations and their rates of occurrence have been documented in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Four mutations were assessed in mosquito populations from five Texas counties, USA. Differences between Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus were calculated and determined for kdr mutations F1534C and V410L, but there was no difference with the mutation V1016I. Furthermore, S989P was not detected in either species. Multiple combinations of di-locus and tri-locus mutations were detected in mosquitoes from all counties. These combinations can amplify insecticide resistance, limiting the effectiveness of vector control operations.

During the last 20 years, there has been increasing concern about inefficient vector control efforts due to insecticide resistance. A common mechanism causing insecticide resistance is mutational changes in the voltage-gated sodium channel, deemed knockdown resistance (kdr), resulting from continued pyrethroid application. Although closely related, there have been documented kdr differences and frequencies between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Individual Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus from five counties in Texas, USA were tested using four single nucleotide polymorphisms genotyping assays to assess the kdr (F1534C, V1016I, V410L, and S989P) differences between the two species. Each mutation was analyzed independently by calculating frequencies and analyzing the difference using a Wilcox Rank Sum test. Significant differences were observed between Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus when comparing F1534C and V410L (p-value < 0.0001). Knockdown resistant mutation V1016I was not different between the two species. Individuals from both species had di-locus mutations, and individuals from Ae. aegypti had tri-locus mutations detected in combinations that have been reported to influence insecticide resistance. Given our findings, one can speculate that populations of both species are resistant to pyrethroids, thus likely limiting the success of control methods.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** pyrethroid (PubChem CID 60202781)
- **Species:** Aedes aegypti (taxon 7159), Aedes albopictus (taxon 7160)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** pyrethroid (MESH:D011722)
- **Species:** Aedes aegypti (yellow fever mosquito, species) [taxon 7159], Aedes albopictus (Asian tiger mosquito, species) [taxon 7160]
- **Mutations:** V1016I, F1534C, S989P, V410L

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192800/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192800/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192800/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192800