# Genetic Factors Linking Nucleolar Stress with R2 Retrotransposon Expression in Drosophila melanogaster

**Authors:** Shova Pandey, An Tri Nguyen, Audrey K. Maricle, Patrick J. DiMario

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ijms26125480 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025-06-07

## TL;DR

This study explores how genetic factors influence R2 retrotransposon expression in fruit flies, linking nucleolar stress to specific gene mutations.

## Contribution

The study identifies Udd and Nopp140 as key regulators of R2 retrotransposon expression in Drosophila.

## Key findings

- Loss of Udd or Nopp140 leads to increased R2 expression in specific developmental stages.
- Nopp140-RGG isoform over-expression induces R2 expression in larval somatic tissues.
- Minute mutations in ribosomal protein genes have minor effects on R2 expression.

## Abstract

R2 retrotransposons reside exclusively within the 28S regions of 10–20% of all rDNA genes comprising the nucleolar organizer loci on the X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. These R2-inserted genes are normally silent and heterochromatic. When expressed, however, the R2 transcript is co-transcribed with the 28S rRNA. Self-cleavage releases a 3.6 kb mature R2 transcript that encodes a single protein with endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities that facilitate R2 element transposition by target-primed reverse transcription. While we know the molecular details of R2 transposition, we know little about the genetic mechanisms that initiate R2 transcription. Here, we examine R2 expression in wild type versus mutant backgrounds. R2 expression in stage 1–4 wild type egg chambers was variable depending on the stock. R2 expression was silent in wild type stages 5–10 but was consistently active during nurse cell nuclear breakdown in stages 12–13 regardless of the genetic background. Massive R2 expression occurred in stages 5–10 upon loss of Udd, an RNA Pol I transcription factor. Similarly, loss of Nopp140, an early ribosome assembly factor, induced R2 expression more so in somatic tissues. Interestingly, over-expression of the Nopp140-RGG isoform but not the Nopp140-True isoform induced R2 expression in larval somatic tissues, suggesting Nopp140-RGG could potentially affect rDNA chromatin structure. Conversely, Minute mutations in genes encoding ribosomal proteins had minor positive effects on R2 expression. We conclude that R2 expression is largely controlled by factors regulating RNA Pol I transcription and early ribosome assembly.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** udd (under-developed) [NCBI Gene 35781], NOLC1 (nucleolar and coiled-body phosphoprotein 1) [NCBI Gene 9221], CD1E (CD1e molecule) [NCBI Gene 913]
- **Species:** Drosophila melanogaster (taxon 7227)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** udd (under-developed) [NCBI Gene 35781] {aka CG18316, Dmel\CG18316}, Nopp140 (Nopp140) [NCBI Gene 40433] {aka CG7421, DmNopp140, Dmel\CG7421, NCL, Nopp- 140}
- **Chemicals:** 28S (-)
- **Species:** Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly, species) [taxon 7227]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192640/full.md

## Figures

9 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192640/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192640/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12192640