# Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study

**Authors:** Andrew M. Fleming, Owen M. Clark, Jaewon J. Lee, Kristen Dougherty, Leah E. Hendrick, Jordan Raine, Ian Solsky, Paxton V. Dickson, Evan S. Glazer, David Shibata, Elizabeth Gleeson, Gitonga Munene, Jeremiah L. Deneve

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/cancers17122014 · Cancers · 2025-06-17

## TL;DR

Repeat surgery and chemotherapy can help some cancer patients survive longer after cancer returns in the abdomen.

## Contribution

This study shows repeat CRS/HIPEC is safe and effective for appendiceal cancer recurrence but not for colorectal cancer.

## Key findings

- Repeat CRS/HIPEC achieved complete cytoreduction in 79% of appendiceal cancer patients.
- Appendiceal cancer patients had significantly improved survival after repeat CRS/HIPEC.
- Colorectal cancer patients did not show improved survival with repeat CRS/HIPEC.

## Abstract

Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. We examined the outcome for appendiceal and colorectal cancer patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC after isolated peritoneal recurrence. Repeat CRS/HIPEC was safe and associated with the potential for a long-term survival outcome, particularly for appendiceal cancer.

Background: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal (pAC) and colorectal (pCRC) cancers. Kaplan–Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. Results: Of 157 patients, 103 patients underwent initial CRS/HIPEC for pAC (n = 67) or pCRC (n = 36) histologies. Twenty-seven pAC patients (27/67, 40%) and 23/36 pCRC patients (63%) developed disease recurrence. Relapsed patients had a higher burden of disease (PCI), operative length and blood loss and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all p < 0.05). Nine of the 27 relapsed pAC patients and 5 of the 13 relapsed pCRC patients underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC. The median time to repeat CRS/HIPEC was 18 months (4–26 months), and a CCR-0 and CCR-1 were achieved in 79% and 21%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS for pAC patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC was 88.9%, 88.9% and 77.8%, and the 1- and 3-year OS for pCRC patients was 100% and 25%, respectively. Repeat CRS/HIPEC for pAC was associated with significant improvement in OS (p = 0.03), while for pCRC, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.99). Conclusions: Repeat CRS/HIPEC for isolated peritoneal recurrence is safe and offers the potential for long-term survival. Patient selection is key to ensure optimal cytoreduction when considering repeat CRS/HIPEC.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** colorectal cancer (MONDO:0005575)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers (MESH:D015179), blood loss (MESH:D016063), Peritoneal Metastases (MESH:D010538)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12191129/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12191129/full.md

## References

23 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12191129/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12191129