# Angiogenesis in Atrial Fibrillation: A Literature Review

## TL;DR

This review explores how new blood vessel formation, or angiogenesis, contributes to atrial fibrillation and suggests potential therapeutic strategies.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive synthesis of angiogenesis's dual role in atrial fibrillation and highlights therapeutic opportunities and challenges.

## Key findings

- Excessive angiogenesis promotes atrial remodeling and electrical dysfunction via VEGF, ANGPT, and FGF pathways.
- Compensatory angiogenesis can protect against ischemia and inflammation by improving tissue perfusion.
- Non-selective VEGF inhibition poses cardiovascular risks, while anti-cancer agents may increase AF risk.

## Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia, is characterized by chaotic atrial electrical activity and currently affects an estimated 2.5–3.5% of the global population. Its pathogenesis involves ion channel dysfunction, inflammatory cascades, and structural remodeling processes, notably fibrosis. Angiogenesis, the physiological/pathological process of new blood vessel formation, plays a multifaceted role in AF progression. This review synthesizes evidence highlighting angiogenesis’s dual role in AF pathogenesis: while excessive or dysregulated angiogenesis promotes atrial remodeling through fibrosis, and electrical dysfunction via VEGF, ANGPT, and FGF signaling pathways, compensatory angiogenesis exerts protective effects by improving tissue perfusion to alleviate ischemia and inflammation. Therapeutically, targeting angiogenic pathways—particularly VEGF—represents a promising strategy for modulating structural remodeling; however, non-selective VEGF inhibition raises safety concerns due to cardiovascular toxicity, necessitating cautious exploration. Emerging evidence highlights that anti-cancer agents (e.g., ibrutinib, bevacizumab) impair endothelial homeostasis and elevate AF risk, underscoring the need for cardio-oncology frameworks to optimize risk–benefit ratios. Preclinical studies on angiogenesis inhibitors and gene therapies provide mechanistic insights, but clinical validation remains limited. Future research should prioritize elucidating mechanistic complexities, developing biomarker refinement, and implementing interdisciplinary strategies integrating single-cell sequencing with cardio-oncology principles. This review emphasizes the imperative to clarify angiogenic mechanisms, optimize therapeutic strategies, and balance pro-arrhythmic versus compensatory angiogenesis, in pursuit of personalized AF management.