# Distribution and Clinical Impact of Helicobacter pylori Virulence Factors in Epstein–Barr-Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer

## TL;DR

This study explores how Helicobacter pylori virulence factors are linked to Epstein–Barr virus-associated gastric cancer and their impact on clinical outcomes.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific H. pylori virulence factors associated with EBV coinfection in gastric cancer.

## Key findings

- EBV infection was linked to gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma and proximal stomach location.
- H. pylori strains from EBV-positive patients showed higher prevalence of iceA2 and ureA, and lower prevalence of iceA1 and vacA s1a.
- UreA was significantly associated with EBVaGC but did not affect clinical outcomes.

## Abstract

Background: Helicobacter pylori (HP) and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) coinfection lead to chronic inflammation and contribute to the development of gastric cancer. However, studies examining the association between HP virulence factors and EBV infection in gastric cancer are limited. This study investigated the polymorphisms of HP virulence factors associated with EBV infection and their effects on clinical outcomes in EBV-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC). Methods: A total of 96 HP isolates from 54 patients with gastric cancer were divided and analyzed based on EBV coinfection status. Polymerase chain reaction amplifications of virulence factors were conducted using DNA extracts from HP isolates cultured from gastric mucosal specimens. Results: EBV infection was significantly associated with gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma morphology and a proximal location in the stomach. Most HP strains from patients with gastric cancer were positive for cagA (100.0%), vacA (100.0%), and iceA1 (87.5%). Among HP isolates with EBV coinfection, the prevalence of iceA2 (21.7% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001) and ureA (21.7% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.009) was significantly more frequent, and that of iceA1 (78.3% vs. 96.0%, p = 0.009) and vacA s1a (4.3% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.012) was less frequent than those of EBV– colonies. Multivariate analysis indicated that ureA (odds ratio, 6.148; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.221 to 30.958; p = 0.028) was associated with EBVaGC. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was observed based on the presence of ureA expression in EBVaGC. Conclusions: In gastric cancer, regardless of EBV infection, most HP strains were highly virulent, testing positive for cagA, vacA, and iceA1. Although ureA was significantly associated with EBV infection, it did not influence the clinical outcomes of EBVaGC.