# Cogito, Ergo Contraho: Think Big or Think Small? How Construal Level Theory Shapes Creative Agreements

**Authors:** Hyeran Choi

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/bs15060775 · Behavioral Sciences · 2025-06-04

## TL;DR

This study shows that both abstract and concrete thinking help in creative negotiations, with cognitive flexibility being key to generating innovative solutions.

## Contribution

The study reveals that cognitive flexibility, not just abstract thinking, enhances creative agreements in negotiations.

## Key findings

- Concrete thinking supports creative agreement formation, challenging the belief that it limits innovation.
- Cognitive flexibility improves both idea generation and problem-solving in negotiation scenarios.
- Switching between abstract and concrete thinking leads to better negotiation outcomes.

## Abstract

Creativity is a vital element for successful negotiation and positive business outcomes. However, a complete understanding of how different thinking styles shape creative agreements is still developing in research. This study examines how broad and detailed thinking affects the ability to create inventive deals, with a particular focus on construal level theory. While past research has often highlighted abstract thinking as the main way to be creative, this study shows that both abstract and concrete thinking contribute to making creative deals but in different ways. For example, Study 1 looks at how concrete thinking helps in forming creative agreements, tested with 114 undergraduate students in a laboratory experiment. This challenges the common idea that concrete thinking limits new ideas. Study 2 then explores the benefits of thinking that combines different viewpoints, where negotiators can skillfully switch between abstract and concrete ways of thinking, tested with 96 students in another laboratory experiment. Across two experiments, mediation analyses were conducted to examine the hypothesized relationships. Findings indicate that cognitive flexibility—the ability to switch thinking styles—benefits both idea generation and specific problem-solving. This study’s implications span negotiation strategies, fostering organizational creativity, and developing flexible thinking approaches for problem-solving.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CLT (MESH:C564133), injury to (MESH:D014947), mental fatigue (MESH:D005222)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12189516/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12189516/full.md

## References

75 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12189516/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12189516