# Clinical and radiographical analysis of percutaneous kyphoplasty with multi-point cement anchoring technique for preventing bone cement displacement in Kümmell’s disease of stage I and II

**Authors:** Heng Wu, Xiao Dai, Hao Liu, Xiang Yang, Shenao Liu, Shuang Xu, Hao Chi, Yuquan Chen, Song Wang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1538337 · Frontiers in Endocrinology · 2025-06-11

## TL;DR

A new surgical technique called A-PKP was developed to reduce bone cement displacement in patients with early-stage Kümmell’s disease, showing better outcomes than traditional methods.

## Contribution

The novel A-PKP technique with multi-point cement anchoring is introduced to prevent cement displacement in Kümmell’s disease.

## Key findings

- A-PKP patients had better pain relief and improved disability scores compared to conventional PKP patients.
- A-PKP significantly reduced the risk of bone cement displacement and adjacent vertebral fractures.
- The cement distribution score was identified as a protective factor against postoperative vertebral fractures.

## Abstract

The present study introduced a novel technique called percutaneous kyphoplasty with multi-point cement anchoring technique (A-PKP) to prevent bone cement displacement in patients with stage I and II Kümmell’s disease (KD).

A total of 82 patients with stage I and II KD were treated with PKP in our hospital from April 2020 to October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: A-PKP group (N=39) where the Kirschner needle was used for the multi-point cement anchoring technique, and conventional transverse process-pedicle percutaneous kyphoplasty group (T-PKP group; N=43) where the Kirschner needle was not used. The operation time, volume of cement, VAS score, ODI score, cement distribution pattern and score, bone cement leakage, adjacent vertebra fracture, and bone cement displacement were compared between the two groups. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between outcome variables and adjacent vertebral fractures, as well as to identify potential protective and risk factors following kyphoplasty.

All patients in both groups were operated successfully, with no serious complications reported. Compared with T-PKP patients, A-PKP patients had longer operation time (39.7 ± 4.86 min vs. 34.5 ± 3.18 min, P < 0.05), greater volume of cement (5.1 ± 0.41 ml vs. 4.3 ± 0.27 ml, P < 0.05), greater improvement in Visual Analog Scale (2.0 ± 0.48, 1.92 ± 0.72 vs. 3.0 ± 0.10, 3.1 ± 0.62, P < 0.05) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (17.9 ± 2.38, 14.8 ± 2.02 vs. 20.2 ± 3.31, 17.2 ± 2.55, P < 0.05) during follow-ups, more spongy cement configuration with higher distribution scores (10.0 ± 1.17 vs. 7.74 ± 1.08, P < 0.05), lower incidence of bone cement leakage (20.5% vs. 27.9%, P > 0.05), and lower rate of adjacent vertebra fractures (5.1% vs. 18.6%, P < 0.05) and bone cement displacement (2.5% vs. 20.9%, P < 0.05). The logistic regression results reveal that bone cement distribution score (OR= 0.355, 95% CI 0.171–0.734, P=0.005) acts as protective factor of adjacent vertebral fractures following kyphoplasty.

The A-PKP technique appears to be a safer and more effective alternative for patients with stage I and II KD. It effectively alleviates pain, enhances cement diffusion, and minimizes the risk of bone cement displacement compared with the T-PKP.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146), T-PKP (MESH:D001260), vertebra fracture (MESH:C562952), vertebral fractures (MESH:C535781), KD (MESH:D004194), stage I and II KD (MESH:D058625)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12187816/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12187816/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12187816/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12187816