Correction to: Deaf role-models for Deaf children in hearing families: a scoping review
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHearing Impairment and Communication
This is a correction to: Angela Joy, Susan Ledger, Jill Duncan, Deaf role-models for Deaf children in hearing families: a scoping review, The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2024, enae028, https://doi.org/10.1093/jdsade/enae028
In the section entitled “Deaf Gain” and Associated Cultural Capital of this paper, the following sentence has been corrected, in order to provide clarification of the origin of the term “Deaf Gain”:
Deaf Gain is a term that Hamilton and Clark (2020) use as an antonym to hearing loss, referring to Deaf people as having a “cultural and linguistic difference” rather than being “defective, and needing to be fixed (p. 714).
The updated sentence reads as follows:
Deaf Gain is an affirming concept devised by Bauman and Murray (2014) that emphasizes the unique benefits of Deafness, challenging the polarized view of Deafness as a disability. Hamilton and Clark (2020) also use this term as an antonym for hearing loss, referring to Deaf people as having a “cultural and linguistic difference” rather than being “defective, and needing to be fixed” (p. 714).