Corrigendum: External mechanical perturbations challenge postural stability in dogs
Christiane Lutonsky, Christian Peham, Marion Mucha, Bianca Reicher, Rita Gaspar, Alexander Tichy, Barbara Bockstahler
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology · Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
In the published article, there was an error in form of a distortion of words concerning the results of one comparison (COP-MedLat vs. COP-CranCaud). While the tables (Table 4 and Table 5), discussion and conclusion offer the right findings, the abstract and conclusion state the opposing.
A correction has been made to Abstract, page 1.
This sentence previously stated:
“The mediolateral COP displacement was significantly greater than the craniocaudal COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The craniocaudal COP displacement was significantly greater than the mediolateral COP displacement during standing measurement and conditions with a small amplitude, whereas no significant difference was observed during settings with an increased amplitude.”
A correction has been made to Results, 3.3 Center of pressure, page 6, paragraph 6.
This sentence previously stated:
“The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-MedLat than in COP-CranCaud during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The COP displacement was significantly larger in COP-CranCaud than COP-MedLat during standing measurement, Speed-20%, and Speed-30%, whereas no significant differences were observed during the remaining conditions (Table 5).”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.