Large Variation in Adherence to Diagnostic Guidelines in Hypertension Management in Swedish Primary Healthcare
Mikko Hellgren, Kristina Bengtsson Boström, Katarina Hedin, Stefan Jansson, Staffan Nilsson, Gunnar Nilsson, Per Wändell, Patrik Wennberg

TL;DR
This study finds large variation in how Swedish primary healthcare centers follow updated guidelines for diagnosing hypertension, with no clear link to organizational or demographic factors.
Contribution
The novel contribution is identifying significant variability in hypertension diagnostic guideline adherence across PHCCs in Sweden, independent of organizational characteristics.
Findings
Only 13.7% of PHCCs often use ABPM and 16.0% often use HBPM for hypertension diagnosis.
57.3% of PHCCs perform BP measurements in both arms as recommended.
No organizational or sociodemographic factors were associated with adherence to diagnostic guidelines.
Abstract
High blood pressure (BP) is a frequent cause for visits to primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) in Sweden. Guidelines on methods for BP measurements for diagnosis of hypertension have recently been updated. We aimed to study adherence to diagnostic guidelines in hypertension management and evaluate whether adherence to guidelines was related to organizational or sociodemographic characteristics. Interviews with representatives from 76 randomly selected PHCCs from eight regions in Sweden were conducted. PHCCs’ use of 24‐h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), home BP monitoring (HBPM) and BP measurements in both arms for the diagnosis of hypertension were chosen as proxy markers for adherence to diagnostic guidelines. An adherence index was created as a composite score of these diagnostic methods. The proportion of PHCCs stating they “often use” ABPM and HBPM were 13.7% and 16.0%, respectively,…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Health Sciences Research and Education
