A descriptive study on feasibility of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab collection from pediatric research participants in Cebu, Philippines
Clarissa De Guzman, Ma. Gladys Nicole Daque, March Helena Jane Lopez, Anna Maureen Cuachin, Maria Vinna Crisostomo, Michelle Ylade, Jacqueline Deen

TL;DR
This study explores the challenges of collecting nasal and throat swabs from children in Cebu, Philippines, finding that fear, discomfort, and perceived lack of necessity are major barriers.
Contribution
The study provides insights into the feasibility and acceptability of swab collection for respiratory virus surveillance among pediatric populations in a specific regional context.
Findings
Only 16.1% of participants agreed to undergo NPS/OPS collection, all from the community-based study.
Fear or discomfort was cited as a reason for refusal by 20.5% of participants.
None of the hospital-based participants agreed to NPS/OPS collection.
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal (NPS) and oropharyngeal (OPS) swab collection are vital in the diagnosis and surveillance of respiratory viruses. However, the acceptability of these procedures among children remains a challenge. We conducted a descriptive study using data from two pediatric observational studies in Cebu, Philippines (July 2021–October 2022). One was a community-based study, involving febrile adolescents aged 13–19 years, and the other was a hospital-based study, involving febrile children aged 1 month to <5 years. Both studies aimed to collect NPS/OPS samples for respiratory pathogen testing, including SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus. We described reasons for refusal of NPS/OPS collection obtained from parents or guardians who were approached for participation in these studies. Among 180 children enrolled from study sites in Bogo and Balamban Cebu, 134…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics in Clinical Research · Global Health and Surgery · Healthcare cost, quality, practices
