Attributing non-specific symptoms to cancer in general practice: A scoping review
Gladys Langue, India Pinker, Valerie Moran, Sophie Pilleron

TL;DR
This scoping review explores how general practitioners interpret non-specific symptoms as potential signs of cancer and identifies gaps in current research.
Contribution
The study provides a structured overview of how non-specific symptoms are attributed to cancer in general practice and highlights under-researched areas.
Findings
Only eight studies were found addressing symptoms like fatigue, weight loss, and deep vein thrombosis.
General practitioners consider factors like symptom combinations, gut feeling, and patient concerns when attributing symptoms to cancer.
Symptoms such as pruritus and new-onset diabetes remain under-researched in the context of cancer attribution.
Abstract
Non-specific cancer symptoms are challenging to interpret in general practice. They can be attributed to a wide range of other conditions and delay the cancer diagnosis, increasing the risk of poor outcomes. To summarise existing knowledge on the attribution of non-specific symptoms to potential cancer in general practice and identify gaps in the literature. We conducted a scoping review, following Joanna Briggs Institute’s guidance and reported according to the PRISMA for scoping reviews checklist. Non-specific symptoms were defined based on NICE guidelines for suspected cancer. We systematically searched six databases and search engines for original papers, systematic reviews and doctoral theses. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, full-texts and reference lists. Included articles were then uploaded to the AI-based tool ResearchRabbit to identify further papers.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
