Prescribing Vitamin-K-Antagonists Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Bavarian General Practitioners: A Qualitative Study
Nikoletta Zeschick, Julia Gollnick, Julia Muth, Franziska Hörbrand, Peter Killian, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Thomas Kühlein, Maria Sebastião

TL;DR
This study explores why Bavarian general practitioners prescribe cheaper vitamin-K-antagonists or more expensive direct oral anticoagulants, despite cost differences and policy goals.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the decision-making factors of general practitioners when prescribing anticoagulants under economic and clinical pressures.
Findings
Costs of DOACs versus phenprocoumon played a minor role in GPs' prescribing decisions.
Patient cooperation and time constraints were significant challenges when prescribing phenprocoumon.
Hospital-based prescribing of DOACs made it difficult for GPs to meet cost-saving targets.
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly prescribed instead of vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) although VKAs cost considerably less than DOACs. In 2014, a new system for drug expenditures, the Wirkstoffvereinbarung (WSV, Active substance agreement), was implemented in Bavaria, Germany to control pharmaceutical expenditures transparently. Achieving the targets for the VKAs set by the WSV was difficult for general practitioners (GPs). We explored the determinants of prescribing VKAs (specifically phenprocoumon) versus DOACs. Qualitative interviews (n = 18) and two small group discussions (n = 10) were conducted with GPs. For the qualitative content analysis, we formed a system of categories based on the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Participants actively weighed various factors when deciding between prescribing phenprocoumon or DOACs. Costs played a…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
