Cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength in offspring conceived through assisted reproductive technologies: results from the Munich heARTerY-study
Marie Kramer, Pengzhu Li, Magdalena Langer, Theresa Vilsmaier, Franziska Sciuk, Brenda Kolbinger, André Jakob, Nina Rogenhofer, Robert Dalla-Pozza, Christian Thaler, Nikolaus Alexander Haas, Felix Sebastian Oberhoffer

TL;DR
This study finds that children conceived through assisted reproductive technologies may have lower cardiorespiratory fitness compared to naturally conceived children.
Contribution
This is the first study to compare cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength in children conceived via assisted reproductive technologies versus naturally conceived children.
Findings
ART participants had significantly lower estimated VO2max and pulse rate recovery compared to controls.
No significant differences in muscle strength were observed between the two groups.
Adjustments for age, birthweight, and gestational age confirmed the differences in cardiorespiratory fitness.
Abstract
Children conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART) potentially display an increased cardiovascular morbidity. Despite cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscle strength being key indicators of cardiovascular outcomes, they have not been investigated in ART offspring yet. This observational pilot cohort study aimed to evaluate CRF and muscle strength in ART participants and spontaneously conceived controls. Anthropometric variables, diet quality, level of physical activity, and sedentary behavior were evaluated. Participants performed a 6-min walking test (6MWT) and a 20-m shuttle run test (20mSRT). 6MWT distance and the number of archived laps were assessed, the maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max) was estimated, and pulse rate recovery was calculated. Maximal hand grip strength (HGS) was determined as a marker of muscle strength. Generalized linear models were used to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy · Congenital Heart Disease Studies · Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
