# Effect of pedestal fan use on serum stress biomarkers in older adults exposed to simulated daylong indoor overheating

**Authors:** Ben J. Lee, Thomas McCarthy, Fergus O'Connor, Sarah L. Davey, C. Douglas Thake, James J. McCormick, Kelli E. King, Pierre Boulay, Robert D. Meade, Glen P. Kenny

PMC · DOI: 10.14814/phy2.70390 · Physiological Reports · 2025-06-21

## TL;DR

Pedestal fans did not reduce stress or gut damage in older adults during simulated indoor heat exposure.

## Contribution

This study reveals that pedestal fans do not mitigate physiological strain or gut damage in older adults during prolonged heat exposure.

## Key findings

- End-exposure core temperature increased by ~1.0°C in all conditions.
- IFABP and LBP increased after heat exposure but not due to fan use.
- No significant changes were observed in sCD14, IL-6, TNFα, CRP, or NGAL.

## Abstract

There is an urgent need to develop targeted heat‐alleviation strategies to protect heat‐vulnerable older adults. We have shown that electric fan use had nominal impact on reducing body core temperature and cardiovascular strain during daylong exposure to simulated indoor overheating. Here, we examined the effects of pedestal fan use during exposure to hot conditions on systemic markers of enterocyte damage, immune activation, renal ischemia, and inflammation in older adults. Eighteen adults (8 females; age 72, SD 7 years) underwent 3 randomized 8‐h exposures to 36°C, 45% relative humidity seated in front of a fan delivering air speeds of 0 m/s (control), 2 m/s (normal air speed delivered by electric fans), or 4 m/s (air speed used in biophysical modeling). Body core temperature and cardiovascular strain were measured throughout. Blood samples were obtained for analysis of systemic biomarkers before and at the end of exposure. End‐exposure core temperature was elevated ~1.0°C from baseline in all conditions. Following heat exposure, IFABP increased by 364 pg/mL [95% CI: 59, 670; p = 0.02] and LBP increased by 3.06 ng/mL [1.12, 5.00; p = 0.002] but was not different between the fan use and control condition (all p ≥ 0.15). No changes were observed for sCD14, IL‐6, TNFα, CRP, or NGAL (all p ≥ 0.15). The use of electric fans during daylong exposure to indoor overheating failed to meaningfully mitigate increases in physiological strain or biochemical markers associated with enterocyte damage and immune activation in older adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05695079.

Pedestal fans were not effective at mitigating physiological strain or indices of gastrointestinal barrier damage and endotoxemia in older adults exposed to daylong indoor overheating.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** FABP2 (fatty acid binding protein 2), LBP (lipopolysaccharide binding protein), Scd1_1 (acyl-CoA Delta-9 desaturase), IL6 (interleukin 6), TNF (tumor necrosis factor), CRP (C-reactive protein), LCN2 (lipocalin 2)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** FABP2 (fatty acid binding protein 2) [NCBI Gene 2169] {aka FABPI, I-FABP}, IL6 (interleukin 6) [NCBI Gene 3569] {aka BSF-2, BSF2, CDF, HGF, HSF, IFN-beta-2}, CRP (C-reactive protein) [NCBI Gene 1401] {aka PTX1}, TNF (tumor necrosis factor) [NCBI Gene 7124] {aka DIF, IMD127, TNF-alpha, TNFA, TNFSF2, TNLG1F}, LCN2 (lipocalin 2) [NCBI Gene 3934] {aka 24p3, MSFI, NGAL, p25}
- **Diseases:** renal ischemia (MESH:D007511), cardiovascular strain (MESH:D013180), inflammation (MESH:D007249)
- **Chemicals:** pedestal fan (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12181687/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12181687/full.md

## References

52 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12181687/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12181687