# EMG versus US: a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy in guiding botulinum toxin treatment in cervical dystonia

**Authors:** Mayara Thouin Graciani, Flávio Henrique de Rezende Costa, Ana Lucia Zuma de Rosso, Gil Fernando Salles

PMC · DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809542 · Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria · 2025-06-20

## TL;DR

This study compared ultrasound and electromyography for guiding botulinum toxin treatment in cervical dystonia and found no difference in effectiveness.

## Contribution

A randomized clinical trial directly comparing US and EMG guidance for BoNT-A treatment in cervical dystonia.

## Key findings

- Both US and EMG guidance resulted in similar reductions in TWSTRS scores.
- No significant differences were observed in severity, incapacity, or pain components between the groups.
- Improvements were consistent across both methods, with all p-values over 0.3.

## Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is considered the first-line therapy for cervical dystonia.

To compare, in a randomized trial, the efficacy of treatment with BoNT-A guided by ultrasound (US) and electromyography (EMG) in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia.

A total of 40 patients (20 in each group; mean age: 54 years; 45% of female subjects; mean disease duration: 10.7 years) were randomized to either US- or EMG-guided BoNT-A treatment. The efficacy of BoNT-A was assessed through changes in the scores on the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) before and 4 to 6 weeks after the treatment. The differences in the absolute and relative changes in the total TWSTRS scores and in its components (severity, incapacity, and pain) between the groups were evaluated.

The US and EMG groups were well balanced in relation to baseline and demographic characteristics. After the BoNT-A treatment, there was a mean reduction in the TWSTRS score of 8 points (relative reduction of 23%) equally between the US and EMG groups (mean difference in absolute decrease of 0.1 point;
p
 = 0.97; and mean difference in relative decrease of 2%;
p
 = 0.89). There were no differences in the declines in the scores on the TWSTRS components, nor when the improvements in the TWSTRS scores were dichotomized as more significant or lower reductions (all
p
-values > 0.3).

The present randomized trial did not demonstrate any difference in improvements between BoNT-A treatment guided by US or EMG in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia.

ReBEC Identifier: RBR-33dd4p4.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cervical dystonia (MONDO:0000481)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** idiopathic cervical dystonia (MESH:D014103), pain (MESH:D010146), dystonia (MESH:D004421)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12180953/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12180953/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12180953/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12180953