# The correlation between ANAs and pregnancy loss and their impact on IVF/ICSI‐ET pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss

**Authors:** Manman Liu, Hebo Zhang, Shilian Xu, Rui Zhang, Mengfan Yuan, Bingnan Ren, Wenjuan Zhang, Zhaozhao Liu, Yichun Guan

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16183 · International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025-01-30

## TL;DR

This study finds that antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are linked to recurrent pregnancy loss and may affect IVF/ICSI outcomes in affected patients.

## Contribution

The study identifies ANA positivity as an independent risk factor for recurrent pregnancy loss and its impact on early miscarriage after embryo transfer.

## Key findings

- ANA positivity is an independent risk factor for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) but not for single pregnancy loss.
- ANA-positive RPL patients have a significantly higher early and total pregnancy loss rate after embryo transfer.
- The association between ANAs and pregnancy loss is most evident in the first trimester.

## Abstract

To explore the correlation between antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and pregnancy loss (PL), and to observe its impact on the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection‐embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI‐ET) in recurrent PL (RPL) patients.

In this retrospective study, patients first seen at the hospital between January 2016 and December 2022 and who underwent two ANA tests within 4–6 weeks were included. After exclusion of confounding factors, patients were allocated to the non‐pregnancy loss (non‐PL), single‐PL, or RPL group according to previous number of PLs, and the correlation between PL and ANAs was analyzed. The first embryo transfer (ET) after in vitro IVF/ICSI without immunological treatment was placed in the RPL group, and patients were classified into the ANA‐negative or ANA‐positive subgroup according to ANA titer. The effect of ANAs on pregnancy outcomes in the RPL patients after IVF/ICSI‐ET was further analyze.

The results of multivariate unordered logistic regression showed that when the non‐PL group was used as the reference, ANA positivity was an independent risk factor for RPL (P = 0.023) but not for single PL (P = 0.654). When the single‐PL group was used as the reference, ANA positivity was an independent risk factor for RPL (P = 0.022). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the early PL rate of the ANA‐positive subgroup was significantly higher than that of the ANA‐negative subgroup (P = 0.009), and the total PL rate of the ANA‐positive subgroup was significantly higher than that of the ANA‐negative subgroup (P = 0.049).

The results showed that ANA positivity may be related to RPL occurrence, but there was no significant correlation between ANA positivity and single PL. ANA positivity is associated with PL occurrence in RPL patients after transfer, and the correlation is reflected mainly in the first trimester.

The results of this study indicate that ANAs are associated with RPL and also with miscarriage in RPL patients after transfer.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** BTG3 (BTG anti-proliferation factor 3) [NCBI Gene 10950] {aka ANA, ANA/BTG3, APRO4, TOB5, TOB55, TOFA}
- **Diseases:** PL (MESH:D000022), RPL (MESH:D000026)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12177300/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12177300/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12177300/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12177300