# First-line treatment options for PD-L1-negative lung adenocarcinoma: a real-world analysis

**Authors:** Lijuan Chen, Jie Liu, Junfeng Lu, Xiufeng Hu, Erjing An, Yanqiu Zhao

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1533048 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2025-06-04

## TL;DR

This study compares first-line treatments for lung adenocarcinoma patients who are PD-L1 negative and without common gene mutations, finding that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy offers the best survival outcomes.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence supporting bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as the preferred first-line treatment for PD-L1-negative LUAD patients without common gene alterations.

## Key findings

- Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival compared to other regimens.
- Groups receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy had better progression-free survival and disease control rates.
- Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all groups and manageable.

## Abstract

To evaluate the optimal first-line treatment options for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) negative lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients without common gene-alterations.

A total of 159 PD-L1-negative LUAD patients without common gene-alterations were included. Chemotherapy was administered in 44 cases (group A), immunotherapy-chemotherapy combinations in 55 cases (group B) and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in 60 patients (group C). A head-to-head comparison of the clinical effectiveness and safety for these standard treatment regimens was conducted.

The median follow-up time was 30.9 months. For the entire cohort, median PFS was 6.67 months [95% CI 5.83-7.51], and median OS was 15.83 months [95% CI 13.46-18.21]. OS was significantly longer in group C versus others (C vs B median 21.6 months [95% CI 17.78-25.42] vs 12.63 months [95% CI 8.14-17.13]; HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.39-0.9], P = 0.01; C vs A median 21.6 months [95% CI 17.78-25.42] vs 13.47 months [95% CI 9.68-17.26], HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.3-0.71], P= 0.001), but no substantial difference was noted between group A and B (HR 0.78 [95% CI 0.51-1.2], P= 0.26). For PFS in pairwise comparison, group B and C were statistically superior to group A (B vs A median 5.6 months [95% CI 4.56-6.64] vs 5.17 months [95% CI 4.09-6.25]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.87], P = 0.009; C vs A median 8.57 months [95% CI 7.47-9.66] vs 5.17 months [95% CI 4.09-6.25]; HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.28-0.7], P< 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between group B and C (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.51-1.11], P= 0.16). The disease control rate (DCR) improvement was sustained with group C (A vs B vs C: 84.09% vs 83.64% vs 96.67%, respectively (P<0.05)). Multivariate analysis showed that the performance status score and treatment regimen were factors influencing PFS as well as OS. The treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of grade 3–4 occurred in a similar proportion of patients in each group (P>0.05), and all AEs were manageable without fatal toxicities.

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy should be prioritized in PD-L1-negative LUAD patients without common driver gene alterations. These findings may facilitate individualized treatment options.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** CD274 (CD274 molecule)
- **Diseases:** lung adenocarcinoma (MONDO:0005061)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CD274 (CD274 molecule) [NCBI Gene 29126] {aka ADMIO5, B7-H, B7H1, PD-L1, PDCD1L1, PDCD1LG1}
- **Diseases:** LUAD (MESH:D000077192), toxicities (MESH:D064420)
- **Chemicals:** Bevacizumab (MESH:D000068258)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12174461/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12174461/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12174461/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12174461