# Partial dependence of ultrasonically estimated fetal weight on biometric parameters

**Authors:** Vasiliki Bitsouni, Nikolaos Gialelis, Vasilis Tsilidis

PMC · DOI: 10.1098/rsos.250172 · 2025-06-18

## TL;DR

This study examines how different fetal measurements affect estimated fetal weight calculations, showing that some measurements are more important than others depending on pregnancy stage and formula used.

## Contribution

The study introduces a global sensitivity analysis approach to quantify the influence of biometric parameters on fetal weight estimation formulas across gestational ages.

## Key findings

- Abdominal circumference is the dominant predictor of fetal weight in later pregnancy.
- Two-thirds of formulas show parameter crossover effects, and nearly half have at least one parameter with minimal contribution.
- Estimates using fewer parameters can be viable in emergencies, depending on gestational age and fetal characteristics.

## Abstract

Accurate assessment of estimated fetal weight (EFW) is crucial in obstetrics, yet the exact contribution of biometric parameters in sonographic formulas remains unclear. Twenty-six datasets from published studies spanning diverse populations and gestational ages were analysed, incorporating measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), head circumference (HC) and femur length (FL). Sobol’ global sensitivity analysis—a variance‑based approach—quantified each parameter’s influence on EFW across 29 established formulas, and bootstrapping estimated the median of the sensitivity indices with 95% confidence intervals. Results showed that AC was generally the dominant predictor, especially in later pregnancy, while BPD, HC and FL exhibited variable importance depending on formula and gestational age. Two-thirds of the formulas demonstrated parameter crossover effects, and nearly half had at least one parameter with minimal contribution. These findings indicate that parameter significance differs by both formula and gestational age, suggesting that clinicians should select EFW formulas based on gestational age, measurement reliability and fetal characteristics. Estimates made with fewer than the intended parameters can be viable in emergencies. The proposed methodology can guide the refinement of existing formulas and the development of improved fetal weight estimation models.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** hydrocephalus (MESH:D006849), BPD (MESH:D015875), AC (MESH:D000007), skeletal dysplasia (MESH:C535858), HC (MESH:D006258), FL (MESH:D000092524)
- **Chemicals:** AC (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12173515/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12173515